This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. ( Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (January 2015) This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article by providing more context for the reader. (June 2023) ( Learn how and when to remove this message) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources:  "Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham" –  news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2023) ( Learn how and when to remove this message) This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Find sources:  "Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham" –  news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2023) ( Learn how and when to remove this message)

Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham
Court	High Court of New Zealand
Court membership
Judge sitting	Wild J

Wrightson Ltd MREINZ v Clapham is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the common law remedy of rectification. ^[1]

References

This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e