From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject icon Olympics: Paralympics Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is within the scope of the Paralympics task force. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject icon Disability Project‑class
WikiProject iconWikipedia:WikiProject Olympics/Paralympics is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Paralympic Games
Beijing
Celebrated
2022
Paris
127 days left
2024
Milan & Cortina
682 days left
2026
Los Angeles
1582 days left
2028

To start a new discussion section, please click here

Editathon hosted by Women in Red

Greetings from WP:WikiProject Women in Red! Starting next month, we’re going to have an editathon for July, August and September for the women of the Olympic and Paralympic Games. WP Paralympic participants are warmly welcomed to join us for the event; additionally if you have relevant lists of red links that we should encourage participants to take up, we’d love to know. Thanks very much! Innisfree987 ( talk)

Category for classified para track and field athletes?

There is already categories for classified para swimmers i.e. S1-classified para swimmers, should there be categories for classified para track and field athletes? I don't whether they should be in a combined class for athletics e.g. T/F11 or F/T11 or separate for track (T11) and field (F11)? SarahTHunter ( talk) 14:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Major RfC on capitalization of all our articles

I thought this was a done deal back in this 2022 RFC but obviously not. A handful of editors did another rfc with no sports projects input at all. And it's being challenged because we just noticed it. This could affect almost every single tennis and Olympic article we have, and goodness know how many other sports. Some may have already been moved it you weren't watching the article. And not just the article titles will be affected but all the player bios that link to the articles. Sure the links would be piped to the right place if thousands of articles moved, but if the wording in a bio still said 2023 Wimbledon Championships – Men's singles or Swimming at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metre backstroke that would likely need to be changed by hand. There is also talk of removing the ndash completely.

Perhaps this is what sports projects want and perhaps not. Either way I certainly don't want projects ill-informed as the last RfC was handled. Express your thoughts at the following rfc. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 21:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Good article reassessment for Laurentia Tan

Laurentia Tan has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 02:52, 30 November 2023 (UTC) reply