This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Pages in the draft namespace should show a link in the draft talk namespace rather than a link such as [[Talk:Draft:Draft|talk]]. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 15:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
I finally figured out what's going on after seeing an example and investigating. A talk add/remove logic issue, basically we didn't have Draft at the time the API was created and it never got added (and a bunch of others too, like Help). fixed example. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 12:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
The {{ RfD}} breaking syntax changes caused no RfDs to be reported for quite a while. Should be fixed now. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 16:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Filled by: HyperGaruda ( talk · contribs)
Time filed: 13:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Link(s): [1]
Comments: See Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Article alerts. In the mentioned edit, an RfD was added, but without a date or a link to the discussion. (ping me if I have to reply, thanks!) - HyperGaruda ( talk) 13:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
example API report
|
---|
{ "batchcomplete": "", "query": { "pages": { "4898795": { "pageid": 4898795, "ns": 0, "title": "Hexal International Group", "categories": [ { "ns": 14, "title": "Category:All redirects for discussion" }, { "ns": 14, "title": "Category:Redirects for discussion from November 2015" }, { "ns": 14, "title": "Category:Redirects to list entries" } ] } } } } |
— HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 14:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Filled by: 8bitW ( talk · contribs)
Time filed: 18:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Link(s): /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Astronomy/Article_alerts
Comments: Alerts aren't being archived. According to user:Headbomb, 'archive time is set to " |archivetime = 90".' I was told to report it, so here it is. Thanks for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8bitW ( talk • contribs)
|archivetime=90
from Astronomy subscription. This just meant the bot tries to wait 90 days since closure before archiving closed entries instead of usual 7. In addition, if the closure date is not known, it waits twice the archive time. This happens to be 90*2, so 6 months since most entries didn't have a closure date. I'll change it to something more like +7 days internally. AfDs should now have closure dates on deleted ones too. A bunch of workflows don't have exact closure dates implemented yet. —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK 21:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Filled by: Daniel Mietchen ( talk · contribs)
Time filed: 21:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Link(s): https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Open_Access/Article_alerts&oldid=672100563
Comments: The current revision still lists an RfC that was closed in August 2015. There also seems to have been some confusion between RfC and RfD, as per the last edit. -- Daniel Mietchen ( talk) 21:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Filled by: Athomeinkobe ( talk · contribs)
Time filed: 00:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Link(s): WikiProject Australia alert, relevant AFD
Comments: Yesterday's (3rd August) article alert for WikiProject Australia reported the AFD of Lavington Square Shopping Centre as being closed, when in fact it is still open and only 2 days old. I note that "It says a page is "closed" and does not provide details is a common bug listed at the top of the page that shouldn't be reported, but I think this is a slightly different situation, since it is reporting the closure of something that isn't closed at all.
This may not be a bug per se, but I was looking at the category of expired PRODs and noticed articles about two Japanese footballers, Ryuji Okada and Ryo Okatani. Neither of them have been listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Article alerts, so it got me wondering whether there is a gap that these two articles may have fallen through. Both are listed in Category:Japanese footballers. AtHomeIn神戸 ( talk) 02:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)