Clerks' Noticeboard
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
Case name | Closed |
---|---|
Conflict of interest management | 13 Apr 2024 |
Mzajac | 7 May 2024 |
Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | ( orig. case) | 30 April 2024 |
Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 4 | none | ( orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | ( orig. case) | 13 May 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerks are welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.
Private matters
The clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.
Procedures
A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is located here.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.
I created an amendment request through this link:
Click here to file a request for amendment of an arbitration decision or procedure (including an arbitration enforcement action issued by an administrator, such as a contentious topics restriction).
When I filed the clarification request, there was no edit summary (and no option for me to add an edit summary). Can support for an edit summary be added? Thank you. Cunard ( talk) 07:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
&nosummary=yes
which prevents an edit summary being added. It was added by
Callanecc in
2015. If I had to guess, the point is to avoid editorialising in an edit summary.
Primefac (
talk) 07:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi I'm having a hard time understanding the rules for wikipedia and find it difficult to understand the articles on it.
Recently I was discussing points on a talk thread and the posts were reverted with the following comment "Reverted 1 edit by Galdrack ( talk): Per WP:ARBECR". I think it's because the posts were deemed to be non-constructive but the implication is with the status of my account I can only make suggested edits and can't contribute to the discussion itself? The rational I was given was rather poor so I'm still confused as to the rules/reasoning. Galdrack ( talk) 14:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)