This
WikiProject is believed to be
inactive. Consider looking for
related projects for help or ask at the
Teahouse.
If you are not currently a project participant and wish to help you may still participate in the project. This status should be changed if collaborative activity resumes. |
Football: Italy Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
Archives |
---|
numbers of clubs were not updated for years. I had updated the following clubs to 2010-11 squad:
The following clubs were seems ok
Other club seems not ok. To me i suggested remove the squad list section until someone had time to updated to 2011-12 squad in September, as more of them were 2009-10 squad. Matthew_hk t c 14:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. As you may know, I have carried out an extensive improvement of the quality of the main Parma article and others related to it. However, there is one very important aspect of the articles that is troubling me. As I'm sure some of you know, Parma were formed in the late '60s and technically have no relation to the 1913 Verdi Foot Ball Club. Despite this, the club claim attahement to the club founded in 1913. Unfortunately, I can find no source which says what I believe (and what those in Italy generally believe) to be the truth. As a result, the some of the Parma articles currently refer to a falsehood because I cannot very well write against the only source I can find on the subject. Is anyone aware of any source that might prove my point? Cheers. Omg † osh 21:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
In the early years of Serie A teams are clasified only after the points.
Until 2004 the Rules for classification were:
1) points; 2) goal difference; 3) number of goals scored. When were this rules introduced? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vfb1893 ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Football/Italy task force to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Italy task force/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr. Z-man 22:35, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:List of Italian football champions (last section).-- 151.70.34.69 ( talk) 20:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
These sentence is wrong:
I corrected:
But an admin rollbacked all.
Why I'm right:
Anyone could correct this? I've used primary sources!
Reverted (or undid is the same)! Sources for the names RSSSF (1924) and sgg. "1st Division North". RSSSF (1927) and sgg.: "Divisione Nazionale" and Piramide.-- 151.70.34.69 ( talk) 20:22, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
In 1929–30 Serie B and later editions until to World War II, the map locating the teams' place is a good idea, but the map is wrong. Italy between 1918 and 1947 included also the whole Venezia Giulia, Istria (with Pola and Fiume) included. So using the map with modern Italy, with Fiume (now Rijeka) and Pola (now Pula) in Croatia, is wrong. In this way in the map in 1929-30 Serie B and 1941-42 Serie B Fiumana is located in Croazia, not in Italy, and this is wrong (also placing Grion Pola, the football team of Pola, in Croazia is wrong). The map should be corrected, inserting a map of the Kingdom of Italy between 1918 and 1947, in order to show Fiume and Pola in Italy, not in Croatia.-- 151.70.48.55 ( talk) 17:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).
Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.
If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot ( talk) (for Mr. Z-man) 05:06, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi everyone. I've made an article Football derbies in Italy, at the moment it is mostly a poorly translated counterpart of its twin brother at Italian wikipedia. There are a ton of redlinks, and there's still a lot of errors, which I'm eliminating one by one but there's only one of me. As you are all part of the Italian football task force, I thought you guys might be able to help out? Abcmaxx ( talk) 20:58, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Italy task force/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Football.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Football, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Both the English and Italian pages -- though mostly excellent -- are confusing as regards the relegation format. With 19 clubs, both are written as though 22 clubs still are in the league. I am not sure if there has been a decision to increase the number of clubs back to 22 in future, or if the exact same relegation/play-out criteria apply now as before, but it is not clear to a non-expert how the system works with 19 instead of 22 clubs. I wonder if someone who has better knowledge of this than I do would have a look at these pages. The Real Rizman ( talk) 13:37, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma ( talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)