Main talk |
Templates RELC |
Articles RELC Stats |
Periodic Table by Quality other PTQs | Pictures | Isotopes | Periodic Table Graphics (PTG) |
Participants WikiChem IRC |
Links |
Elements Project‑class | |||||||
|
Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Featured article candidates
Articles for creation
FA | A | GA | B | C | Start | Stub | FL | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | File | Portal | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? | Total |
29 | 0 | 97 | 104 | 119 | 93 | 36 | 0 | 171 | 305 | 3 | 2 | 116 | 1 | 22 | 3,892 | 227 | 8 | 2 | 5,227 |
An IP user has been adding unsourced lines like
to many elements. Is there a reliable reference online for these values? Johnjbarton ( talk) 22:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
A new paper has announced the discovery of 15 new neutron-rich isotopes of elements copper through krypton and with mass numbers from 84 to 103.
The new nuclides are 84Cu, 86–87Zn, 88–89Ga, 91–92Ge, 93–95As, 96–97Se, 99–100Br, and 103Kr. I cannot access the paper beyond the abstract and figures in order to get any nontrivial information that is not extrapolated in NUBASE2020 + AME2020 II, such as a lower bound on the half-life of the new nuclides.
Also, some of the isotope lists affected by this update are extremely out of date; Isotopes of copper, for example, did not include 81–83Cu until I fully updated the list to NUBASE2020 + AME2020 II, which is why I took the effort to update this one thoroughly. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 22:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Sometimes it is filled with something, sometimes it is merged with the "Normal proportion" column. But most of the time, it just leaved blank. Why this column exist when it is completely empty in that isotopes page?
Completely deleting this column to all pages might be too disruptive, but IMHO this column can be removed for mononuclidic elements. There is only one isotope with abundance 100% for them, so they don't need this column. -- Nucleus hydro elemon ( talk) 06:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hey there, I recently discovered this WikiProject and I'd really like to contribute to the good work that is being done here. I have looked around on the project pages, and am wondering what I could do that would be most useful. Should I adopt one of the element/period/group pages that are not GA yet (and not actively worked on by a project member) and focus on improving it? Patrol the recent changes on the pages followed by the project? Something else that is crucial but not obvious at first glance? A bit of everything? Thanks! Choucas Bleu ( T· C) 14:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)