From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Today's featured article for August 29, 2024
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 29, 2024
Picture of the day for August 29, 2024

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/August 28 * Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/August 30

Suggested edit:

Dunkelza 19:57 August 23, 2005 (EDT)

Okay. But I'd mention the taxes first. -- PFHLai 01:19, 2005 August 24 (UTC)
I changed it again. The verb 'to protest' doesn't seem to fit a rebellion. BTW, where should the apostrophe be ? -- PFHLai 01:24, 2005 August 24 (UTC)
Where you have it is fine. That's the place it is most commonly located. There was some debate by a Strunk & White fan on the Talk page that led to us dropping it altogether from the article's main title. I'll fix this entry to match the article title ("the Shays Rebellion"). Dunkelza 12:24 August 24, 2005 (EDT)
Need help moving the article ? -- PFHLai 18:42, 2005 August 24 (UTC)
Thanks, but I think we're best off leaving it as is, just for the sake of encyclopedic consistency. I appreciate the offer, though. Dunkelza 17:30 August 25, 2005 (EDT)
You are welcome. :-) -- PFHLai 02:28, 2005 August 26 (UTC)

Hurricane Katrina anniversary

This disaster should be on the MainPage, but I suggest a rewrite to focus on what happened on August 29th. The damages were done over a number of days. How about mentioning the hurricane making landfall near Buras-Triumph, Louisiana or the levees getting breached in New Orleans ? -- PFHLai 19:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Military-Heavy?

We have four military events: an invasion, a battle and two rebellions, and only one non-military event. While these are all certainly notable, couldn't we replace a couple of them with other events so as to avoid a heavy military focus? — Cuivi é nen 01:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I've replaced Shay's Rebellion with Michael Faraday's discovery of electromagnetic induction. Science rarely gets a spot in "On This Day", the discovery is very important to science, and it reduces the number of rebellions in this "On this Day" to one. — Cuivi é nen 01:56, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Yes, it's military-heavy. I ain't happy with it, but Michael Faraday's discovery of electromagnetic induction cannot be used yet. That date is not confirmed and cannot be found in either article. -- PFHLai 15:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply
When the date of this discovery is confirmed and added to the relevant articles, please consider replacing the 1907 item with this. The collapse of the Quebec Bridge is not that significant. It's added there to "dilute the military-centrism" on the template for now. Thanks. -- PFHLai 16:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Quebec Bridge Text Change

I want to suggest a change to the second last point, the one about the Quebec bridge. It currently reads:


and I think it would be better if it read (with change in bold):


or something similar (without the bolding in the final, of course), to reflect the fact that the current bridge is not the same design as the one that collapsed.

JQFTalkContribs 15:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Hong Kong in Treaty of Nanking

The "Hong Kong" ceded in the Treaty of Nanking is Hong Kong Island, not the entire city we call Hong Kong today, need to change the link in the hypertext. 222.153.225.96 ( talk) 12:37, 29 August 2009 (UTC) reply

On the same topic, I've put unequal treaty in quotes. On Talk:Unequal treaty, people have repeatedly brought up issues relating to using that term with no qualifiers across various article. Basically, it's a loaded political term pertaining to Chinese nationalist or historical narratives. Now, the term unequal treaty is also used in an academic context, not just in a nationalistic sense, but even then it's often put in quotes, italics, prefixed with "so-called", or otherwise given some kind of proper context. So to comply with WP:NPOV, we have a couple of options:

1/ Give it some kind of qualifier as I just mentioned. This is what I've done by adding quotes.

2/ Replace it with the more neutral term peace treaty. Only problem with this is it doesn't give the larger imperial context on the various treaties signed and/or imposed on China during this period.

So it's perfectly neutral to say China views a certain treaty as an unequal treaty, but then you'd have to sacrifice brevity in the entry. But at the very least, to use that term without any qualifiers or context as if it's a universally accepted matter-of-fact category of treaty definitely violates NPOV. Spellcast ( talk) 13:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Louis II

Louis II was not killed by the Ottoman army. He fell into a river and drowned while trying to leave the battlefield. The Spy Who Came in from the Cold ( talk) 10:30, 29 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Atahualpa, not the last emperor

Atahualpa was not the last emperor of the Incas as the Spanish established a series of puppet emperors prior to completing their conquest. The Incas would continue their imperial line until Tupac Amaru I. The appropiate thing to write would be that Atahualpa was the last Inca Emperor prior to the Spanish conquest of Peru. Best regards.-- MarshalN20 | Talk 22:07, 29 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Also note that an editor commented at WP:ERRORS that Atahualpa died July 26, but was buried August 29. If this fact is used in 2012, this should be looked into; I'm not sure which is correct. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 00:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply

2012 notes

howcheng { chat} 07:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply

2013 notes

howcheng { chat} 05:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC) reply

2014 notes

howcheng { chat} 06:34, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply

2015 notes

howcheng { chat} 10:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC) reply

2016 notes

howcheng { chat}

2017 notes

howcheng { chat} 03:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC) reply

2018 notes

howcheng { chat} 15:49, 29 August 2018 (UTC) reply

2019 notes

howcheng { chat} 22:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC) reply

2020 notes

howcheng { chat} 21:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC) reply

2021 notes

howcheng { chat} 07:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC) reply

2022 notes

howcheng { chat} 18:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply