PaxEquilibrium's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 00:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC):
Category: 9 Image talk: 12 Image: 39 Mainspace 5046 Portal talk: 10 Portal: 42 Talk: 2318 Template talk: 49 Template: 202 User talk: 5236 User: 302 Wikipedia talk: 108 Wikipedia: 649 avg edits per page 5.22 earliest 16:49, 24 August 2005 number of unique pages 2686 total 14022 2005/8 66 2005/9 245 2005/10 320 2005/11 725 2005/12 891 2006/1 801 2006/2 455 2006/3 699 2006/4 1055 2006/5 651 2006/6 853 2006/7 119 2006/8 75 2006/9 802 2006/10 908 2006/11 998 2006/12 844 2007/1 645 2007/2 527 2007/3 808 2007/4 1148 2007/5 387 (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes edits without an edit summary) Mainspace 252 History of the demographics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 167 Duklja 97 National Assembly of Serbia 91 Stephen II of Bosnia 84 Kosovo 82 Lika 82 Ljudevit Posavski 79 Matej Ninoslav 71 Pagania 68 Serbian parliamentary election, 2007 66 Serbs of Croatia 61 Demographic history of Kosovo 58 Roger Joseph Boscovich 54 Petar II Petrović-Njegoš 53 Montenegrins Talk: 113 Pagania 88 Sokollu Mehmet Paşa 82 Kosovo 75 Roger Joseph Boscovich 69 Kosovo/Archive 8 59 Kosovo/Archive 12 58 Serbs 57 Stephen II of Bosnia 52 Duklja 52 Kosovo/Archive 11 48 House of Petrović-Njegoš 41 History of the demographics of Bosnia and Herzegovina 40 History of Bosnia and Herzegovina 32 Ivo Andrić 32 Montenegrins Category: 2 Kosovo Image: 3 SrbiBalkan.gif 2 Srbi u Jugoslaviji.jpg 2 Arhpetar.jpg 2 Stefan Nemanja.jpg 2 Ston.jpg 2 Mihailo.jpg Image talk: 2 000 Montenegrins.JPG Portal: 14 Montenegro/Did you know 7 Montenegro/Intro 4 Bosnia and Herzegovina/Intro 3 Montenegro/Web resources 2 Montenegro/Featured article 2 Montenegro/Featured person Portal talk: 3 Montenegro 2 Politics 2 Current events Template: 40 Serbian parliamentary election, 2003 15 Serbian elections 13 Montenegrin parliamentary election, 2006 11 Serbian parliamentary election, 2007 11 User cg 8 Serbian political parties 7 Montenegrin elections 6 Assembly of Serbia and Montenegro 5 User cg-4 5 Infobox Kosovo 5 User cg-2 4 User cg-3 4 User bs 4 MontePres 4 User cg-1 Template talk: 14 Serbs 6 User cg-4 4 User cg 4 Serbian elections 3 Assembly of Serbia and Montenegro 3 Serbian parliamentary election, 2003 3 Infobox Kosovo 2 Montenegrins 2 User bs 2 In the news User: 93 PaxEquilibrium 16 PaxEquilibrium/Poll 14 Luka Jačov 10 Nightstallion/notes 9 Chris 73/Archive 008 7 Getoar 6 194.152.217.129 5 PaxEquilibrium/Petition 5 Tar-Elenion 4 Praskaton 4 Linuxbeak/Wikimania 2006/Wikipedian Survey 4 Kubura 3 Ilir pz 3 Elephantus 3 Bormalagurski User talk: 255 Nightstallion 176 PANONIAN 171 Joy 170 Ilir pz 129 Kubura 114 Emir Arven 108 CrnaGora 107 Afrika paprika 107 Jagoda 1 106 Dijxtra 102 Sideshow Bob 94 Dado 89 Kseferovic 89 Mir Harven 85 Marinko Wikipedia: 45 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 41 Requests for page protection 29 Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika 27 Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Workshop 23 Administrators' noticeboard/3RR 21 In the news section on the Main Page/Candidates 20 Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor 4 17 Requests for comment/Emir Arven 17 Personal attack intervention noticeboard 13 Article Creation and Improvement Drive 13 WikiProject Unrecognized countries 11 Requests for checkuser/Case/Kubura 11 Requests for adminship/HolyRomanEmperor3 10 Administrator intervention against vandalism 9 Changing username Wikipedia talk: 11 WikiProject Belgrade 9 WikiProject Former Yugoslavia 9 List of Wikipedians by number of edits 5 WikiProject Serbia 5 Requests for checkuser/Case/Afrika paprika 5 WikiProject Military history/Balkan military history task force 5 Requests for arbitration/Kosovo 4 WikiProject Montenegro 4 WikiProject Kosovo 3 Administrator intervention against vandalism 3 WikiProject Fascism 3 WikiProject Croatia 3 WikiProject History 3 Notability 3 WikiProject Awards
Like I said in the comments already. If someone mentions me a single good reason why I should not be an administrator - he/she should do notify me in person of that and I will withdraw the request.
So far I've seen (aside from votestalking and allegations of my *insanity*) the only argument presented (although User:Alabamaboy has noted the edit summaries, however I do not see this enough as explained at his talk page) is the huge incident that happened over my death hoax around a year ago. I need only one b'crat to come to me and notify me that this is why I simply cannot be trusted admin tools (regardless of whether I'm just a victim or the culprit; I'll understand sensible arguments) - and I will pull this nomination. -- PaxEquilibrium 07:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Bureaucrats judge consensus. There was clearly no consensus - and therefore we cannot promote. Secretlondon 20:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
OK, so let's see:
- User:Zmaj, User:Ceha and possibly (although not surely) User:Ante Perkovic's votes seem to be invited (the first one for sure, probably the second too), while they (the first and the last) call upon my insanity in their (opposing) votes.
- User:Hipocrite has said that he will (or a bureaucrat, if he doesn't) move his vote to neutral after I assured him that I posses a strong password.
3Neutral votes have decided to sit and wait before they finally decide whether they support or oppose me.- 2, one has just determined for Support. -- PaxEquilibrium 07:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
That seems to be it (although I really, really do not understand the explanation given at User:Thewanderer's vote, I don't get it). -- PaxEquilibrium 07:37, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Another Errabee ...
Again a lot of canvassing against an editor who yes has got a POV (we all have), and yes does not keep out of nationalist POV pushing discussions and editing conflicts, and still keeps calm under difficult circumstances.
So much canvassing, in fact, that some habitual visitors of Requests for Adminship start looking for a reason to vote against. "Gee, this guy is controversial, let's find a stick to hit him with."
With Errabee it was his opinion on Commons that was the stick (never mind that nobody actually believed that he would use his adminship to keep copyright violations on Wikipedia), here it is PaxEquilibrium's lack of comment summaries that is used to thwart him (never mind that precisely because PaxEquilibrium keeps cool during tribal wars he writes a lot on talk pages and many people, like me, do not really think those edits need comment summaries).
It seems like people who get involved in such tribal war discussions have virtually no chance of ever becoming an admin now, though Wikipedia actually needs people who know what the ... it is all about. Never mind that PaxEquilibrium's block log is clean, that Errabee was supported by a Polish editor (not me) and that PaxEquilibrium has people from various quarters in the area who want him to be an admin. Too bad. Too bad. (I write that only twice, because if I wrote it thrice, some nut would find something hidden behind that as well).-- Pan Gerwazy 18:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)