I've proposed that a counterpart for WP:FFU be created at commons:. For the proposal, see commons:COM:Requests_for_comment/Files_For_Upload -- 65.92.180.137 ( talk) 03:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
The Articles for creation helper script has been helping reviewers at WP:AfC/R for a while, and just recently we finished building the initial beta version of a similar tool... for FFU. However, we need your help to test it! Follow the instructions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script#Beta version to install it, and after bypassing your cache you should see a [Review request] link in the header of every open request at FFU. Try it out, and please let us know what works—and what doesn't—as well as any suggestions or improvements; we're all ears. Hope to hear from you soon, Theopolisme ( talk) 02:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Old/Resolved reports
|
---|
@ Theopolisme: Another (minor) request. When it adds a comment, it just adds it at the bottom and it ends up with stuff like ( this). Since the script automatically makes a signature, can it also add an additional line (so it separates from previous comments) and/or adds a ":" before so that the comment drops below and indents under the request or comment. Thanks again for the tool, it really is very useful. Saves me lots of time from having to copy/paste and/or remember the tags we use. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 20:45, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
@ Theopolisme: Another one: I tried to mark one as "On Hold" due to AFD, and it would never process. See File:FFD Error Not process.png for my screenshots. Same settings as above.
@ Theopolisme: When there is a request without a link, your tool automatically set it up to put the No URL response which is really nifty, except... when you are reviewing other requests, and don't go back and change it to "None/Ignore this URL" it duplicates a response. It took me a few mishaps to notice this was the reason for my messages duplicating. I don't know what could be done, what do you think? -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 18:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
@ Theopolisme: The "On hold (generic)" add the following text "This request has been placed '''on hold''' while pending a confirmation of permission. For further steps and how to proceed, please read [[Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries]]. If a response is not received within '''seven days''', the request will be declined.". This IMO not needed, and a separate option for this should be added. Armbrust The Homunculus 20:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
@ Theopolisme: If I add a new image to Wikipedia:Files for upload/recent, than it leaves an empty line at the bottom of the gallery template. [1]. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:50, :16 September 2013 (UTC)
It also seems to not be including comments that I add to the request itself. Example, on one of the requests, I selected accept (already uploaded) and made the comment that the secondary photo was not good enough quality to upload. That's odd too. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 20:49, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
|
@ Theopolisme: the script seems determined to keep tagging this as needing permission - despite me not telling the script to do so... -- Mdann 52 talk to me! 14:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
@ Theopolisme: it is still not updating Wikipedia:Files for upload/recent for me, and the link to launch Flickr Upload Bot doesn't work either. Is there something I'm doing wrong, or do I not have the updated tool? -- Тимофей ЛееСуда. 20:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
@ Theopolisme: I recently noticed, that if the requester doesn't sign the request, than the script stalls at the first step and doesn't do, what it should. I'm also seeing, that if I accept multiple request by the same user, than the script edit conflicts with them-self, and only 1 file is posted on the requester's talk page. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 11:20, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
WHat was the reason why the archivebot (cluebot i believe) was turned off here (at the WP space page)? Shouldn't we add one again? mabdul 10:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
{{
User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
. @
Armbrust: do you know of any reason why it shouldn't be enabled?
Theopolisme (
talk) 13:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Just a note to those fulfilling file upload requests: User:Ashton 29 is currently under restrictions regarding file uploads, and is obliged to pass all images that he wishes to upload through the FFU process (details at WP:RESTRICT). There is therefore no need to point out to him that, as a registered and confirmed user, he can do this himself - he can't. This statement is for information only, and should not prejudice any reviewers' response to his requested file uploads. Yunshui 雲 水 14:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Wikipedia:Files for upload/recent has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please correct the image title in:
File:Story Bridge, Brisbane (14964432888).jpg | Story Vridge, Brisbane illuminated in blue lights
"Vridge" -> "Bridge"
Cheers,
Ivan
Malenkovic ( talk) 13:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Wikipedia:Files for upload/recent has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove semi-protected to protected because i cant edit the template even if semi-protected or protected Meezypukka ( talk) 15:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Not done - it is not clear which page, or template, you are referring to, and we don't alter protection levels just because an editor is annoyed. - Arjayay ( talk) 16:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)