From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main case page ( Talk)Evidence ( Talk)Workshop ( Talk)Proposed decision ( Talk)

Case clerks: NuclearWarfare ( Talk) & AlexandrDmitri ( Talk)Drafting arbitrator: Kirill Lokshin ( Talk)

Arbitrators active on this case

Active:

  1. Casliber
  2. Cool Hand Luke
  3. Coren
  4. Jclemens
  5. Kirill Lokshin
  6. Mailer diablo
  7. Newyorkbrad
  8. Risker
  9. Roger Davies
  10. Shell Kinney
  11. SirFozzie

Inactive:

Note: The new arbitrators who took office on January 1 will be initially listed as inactive on cases already pending at that time, but may move to active status on any case either by declaring that they will be active on the case or by voting on it.
  1. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry
  2. David Fuchs
  3. Elen of the Roads
  4. John Vandenberg
  5. Xeno

Recused

  1. Iridescent
  2. PhilKnight


To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators.

Late evidence re JJB

I'm sorry this comes quite late, and it may perhaps seem like a nasty thing to do at this stage, but seeing that an alternative between a full ban and a topic ban for JJB is currently on the table, I think the arbitrators might still want to take into account what I submitted here [1]. Sorry I can't condense it into more handy diffs because I've been a total outsider to all this. Fut.Perf. 21:59, 12 February 2011 (UTC) reply

COI

"Editors do not have a conflict of interest merely because they have personal or professional interest or expertise in a topic, nor because they are members of or affiliated with a group of individuals with personal or professional interest or expertise in a topic." (PP3)

Hmm. If I'm a member of the board of directors of Exxon Corporation, I presumptively have a COI regarding issues relating to CO2 emissions, for example. 71.141.88.54 ( talk) 11:21, 14 February 2011 (UTC) reply

I don't believe that's right. The presumption isn't valid to act upon unless supported by reliable sources, in which case there wouldn't be a COI merely by being part of a group anymore. —  Coren  (talk) 13:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC) reply
Agree with Coren; it takes more than membership. It would, however, create a COI with respect to Exxon. Cool Hand Luke 15:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC) reply