From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Main case page ( Talk)Evidence ( Talk)Workshop ( Talk)Proposed decision ( Talk)

Case clerks: AlexandrDmitri ( Talk) & Seddon ( Talk)Drafting arbitrators: KnightLago ( Talk) & Steve Smith ( Talk)

Question

I assume I'm an "other party," but I'm not really sure. If so, should I add comments to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Asgardian/Workshop? I see areas like "Past dispute resolution" and "Belittling editors" -- are these the places where we can place "Proposed findings of fact ... supported by evidence on the evidence page," as per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration#Workshop. Thanks for helping me understand the guidelines; I'd hate to inadvertently complicate the page. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply

When BOZ proposed I start posting on the Workshop page, I asked the same question, he replied thus. Nightscream ( talk) 01:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Yep, I concur - if you want to make proposals of your own (and if you have any you wish to make, I encourage you to do so), my advice works for you as well. You may also post in the "Comment by parties" section for any item that myself and/or Nightscream has posted thus far. BOZ ( talk) 01:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Agree with above. I am currently reviewing the evidence and plan on posting to the workshop towards the end of this week. KnightLago ( talk) 02:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Still working. I am going through a lot of old differences, which has proved very time consuming. I hope to have something up ASAP. KnightLago ( talk) 18:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC) reply
It's OK - there is a lot to look at. :) BOZ ( talk) 19:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Ditto. I provided a lot of those diffs, so I can wait. Nightscream ( talk) 17:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I have recruited Steve Smith ( talk · contribs) to help comb through everything and try and wrap this up ASAP. The delay remains due to the volume of evidence, not the nature of the decision. KnightLago ( talk) 18:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Your dilligence is appreciated! BOZ ( talk) 19:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply