From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject United States

This list is generated automatically every night around 3 AM UTC (0830 hrs IST).

United States articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 10 70 198 782 2 1,062
FL 2 32 49 353 1 437
FM 1,155 1,155
A 3 30 51 84
GA 18 141 564 4,230 27 4,980
B 113 762 1,907 10,792 529 14,103
C 41 745 3,187 34,986 1 5,438 44,398
Start 5 846 6,858 147,807 28 17,905 173,449
Stub 126 2,156 149,190 68 7,835 159,375
List 3 155 1,037 12,582 209 1,853 15,839
Category 3 142 155,784 155,929
Disambig 1 46 1,598 1,645
File 1 2 37 24,905 24,945
Portal 3,044 3,044
Project 1 1 3 1,561 1,566
Redirect 39 211 5,127 42,182 47,559
Template 2 17 118 21,990 22,127
NA 1 1
Other 3 3
Draft 369 1,096 1,465
Assessed 192 2,924 16,220 366,615 253,621 33,594 673,166
Unassessed 1 425 46 7,212 7,684
Total 192 2,924 16,221 367,040 253,667 40,806 680,850
WikiWork factors ( ?) ω = 2,053,456 Ω = 5.17
Tag & Assess 2012 is now open!

Quality: FA-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | C-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Unassessed
Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low | Unknown

Competition

Drive Organizer/s:

Welcome to Tag & Assess 2012 United States! There are more than 80K unassessed articles about United States. United States has a good number of articles now and needs clean up. This will be beneficial for articles as well as editors as they will be able to interact with editors in their country and will learn new things and can obtain a lot of knowledge about their country. The drive will run from 11 April 2012 to 11 December 2012. The opening/closing time for both days is midnight/0001 hours of that day IST.

The purpose of holding this contest is three-fold:

  1. to ensure that all the articles are within our scope;
  2. to ensure that they are correctly tagged for task forces;
  3. and to ensure that they are correctly assessed for class and importance.
Click on [show] for progress bar

Backlog: Unassessed United States articles
Goal: 0 articles
Current: 7,694 articles
Initial: 28,181 articles
(Refresh)

Rewards

Barnstars will be given after the organizer/s reviews your work at the end of the day. Your work will always be valued. Rewards will be given one after another, e.g., after reaching 200 mark, tireless award then after reaching 400, working man's award and it goes on...

At the end of the contest, the editors with most number of assessments (top 3) will be given Golden wiki barnstar, then Silver and then bronze respectively.

All the best for assessment!

  • Tireless Contributor Barnstar (250 articles)
    Tireless Contributor Barnstar (250 articles)
  • Working Man's Barnstar (500 articles)
    Working Man's Barnstar (500 articles)
  • Barnstar of Diligence (750 articles)
    Barnstar of Diligence (750 articles)
  • Editors Barnstar (1000 articles)
    Editors Barnstar (1000 articles)
  • Special Barnstar (2500 articles)
    Special Barnstar (2500 articles)
  • Modest Barnstar (5000 articles)
    Modest Barnstar (5000 articles)
  • Barnstar of Integrity (7500 articles)
    Barnstar of Integrity (7500 articles)
  • All-round Amazing Barnstar (10000 articles)
    All-round Amazing Barnstar (10000 articles)
  • US Star (12500 articles)
    US Star (12500 articles)
  • US star (Top level) (15000 articles)
    US star (Top level) (15000 articles)
  • 3rd place
    3rd place
  • 2nd place
    2nd place
  • 1st place
    1st place

How to assess?

Lets not make it complicated and divide it in steps:

Usage

General format for the template to be used is as follows: 

{{WP United States|importance=low/mid/high/top|class=stub/start/FA/A/GA/B/Cat/Dab/List/Template/Redirect}}

The class variable 

Following are the values for the parameter class.
Variable Value Denotion Description Examples
class FA Featured article Should be used for any article that has near to perfect content.  {{WP United States|class=FA}}
A A-Class Should be used for any article that is extremely well written.  {{WP United States|class=A}}
GA Good article Should be used for any article that is good but requires attention.  {{WP United States|class=GA}}
B B-Class B-Classes articles come with a criteria list.  {{WP United States|class=B}}
Start Start-Class Should be used for any article that requires attention and more work.  {{WP United States|class=Start}}
Stub Stub Should be used for any article that are too short.  {{WP United States|class=Stub}}
Cat Category list Should be used for a category list of other articles.  {{WP United States|class=Cat}}
Dab Disambiguation Should be used for disambiguation pages.  {{WP United States|class=Dab}}
List List article Should be used for any article that represents a list of things.  {{WP United States|class=List}}
Template Template Should be used for templates only.  {{WP United States|class=Template}}
Redirect Redirect Should be used for redirects only.  {{WP United States|class=Redirect}}

The importance variable

This parameter determines the importance of the article. A value for this can be any of the given values below.

Variable Value Denotion Description Examples
importance Top Top-level importance Used when an article is of top-most priority.  {{WP United States|class=|importance=Top}}
High High-level importance Used when an article is highly important.  {{WP United States|class=|importance=High}}
Mid Mid-level importance Used when an article is of little importance.  {{WP United States|class=|importance=Mid}}
Low Low-level importance Used when an article is not that important.  {{WP United States|class=|importance=Low}}

General parameters

  • class – a rating of the article's quality; see the assessment department for more details.
  • importance – a rating of the article's importance; see the assessment department for more details.
  • attention – "yes" if the article requires immediate attention. This adds the talk page to Category:United States articles needing attention.
  • auto – "yes" if the article was automatically assessed by a bot. This adds the talk page to Category:Automatically assessed United States articles.
  • autoi – "yes" if the article was given an automatic importance by a bot. This adds the talk page to Category:Inherited importance United States articles.
  • needs-infobox – "yes" if the article needs an infobox. This adds the talk page to Category:United States articles needing infoboxes.
  • image-needed – "yes" if the article needs an image or photograph. This adds the talk page to Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the United States.
    • image-in - Used in conjunction with the image-needed=yes parameter to place the image request into a specific location, such as in the state, city or county in the United States. For example, "image-in=New York City" will place the article talk page into Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in New York City. Leave blank or delete if not.
    • Additional image-in2 and image-in3 parameters used in conjunction with the image-needed=yes parameter may be used to specify up to three total location categories (such as for celebrities and other people who may frequent multiple county locations).
    • image-details - (appears only if "image-needed" is set to yes) Additional details to describe the image that is requested.
  • map-needed – "yes" if the article needs an map. This adds the talk page to Category:Wikipedia requested maps in the United States.
    • map-details - (appears only if "map-needed" is set to yes) Additional details to specify the kind of map information that is needed.
    • map-in - Used in conjunction with the map-needed=yes parameter to place the image request into a specific location, such as in the state, city or county in the United States. For example, "map-in=New York City" will place the article talk page into Category:Wikipedia requested maps in New York City. Leave blank or delete if not.
    • Additional map-in2 and map-in3 parameters used in conjunction with the map-needed=yes parameter may be used to specify up to three total location categories (such as for celebrities and other people who may frequent multiple county locations).
  • geocoord-needed - "yes" if the article needs geocoordinate data. This adds the talk page to Category:United States articles missing geocoordinate data.
  • unref – "yes" if the article needs inline citations and references. This adds the talk page to Category:United States articles needing references.
  • small – "yes" to display a small version of the template aligned along the right side of the page.
  • listas – a DEFAULTSORT override sortkey, for use in:
  • Listings being with "The"; e.g. The 13th Regional Corporation, would be listas=13th Regional Corporation, The.
  • Listings being with "List of", would be listas=Bridges in the United States, List of and listas=Botanical gardens in the United States, List of.
  • Proper names; e.g. George Washington, would be listas=Washington, George
  • category – "no" if only if a banner is being used for demonstration or testing purposes, to prevent unnecessary or undesirable categorization.

Portals

  • portalX-name – if the article has been selected for use on a portal, the name of that portal. The name should be given without any formatting or namespace prefixes; thus, Portal:United States is given as "|portal1-name=United States". Up to five different portals may be specified, via the parameters portal1-name through portal5-name.
  • portalX-link – the portal subpage location where the article may be found on the corresponding portal. This should be given as a pure unlinked subpage name; thus, Portal:United States/Selected article/21 is given as "|portal1-link=Selected article/21".

Related projects

National level projects
State and territorial projects
City and local projects
Education and University projects


Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
  FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. under discussion Gerald Ford
  FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of United States cities by population
  FM Pictures that have attained featured picture status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
More detailed criteria
A featured picture:
  1. Is of a high technical standard.
    • It has good contrast, accurate exposure and neutral colour balance.
    • It shows no significant compression artifacts, burned-out highlights, image noise ("graininess") or other processing anomalies. Examples of common technical problems can be found here.
    • Its main subject is in focus, it has good composition and has no highly distracting or obstructing elements.
    • Exceptions to this rule may be made for historical or otherwise unique images. If it is considered impossible to find a technically superior image of a given subject, lower quality may sometimes be allowed. [1]
  2. Is of high resolution.
    • It is of sufficiently high resolution to allow quality print reproduction. Still images should be a minimum of 1500 pixels in width and height; larger sizes are generally preferred. The size of animated images is judged less strictly, though larger is still preferred. Further information on image size can be found here.
      • Exceptions to this rule may be made where justified on a case-by-case basis, such as for historical, technically difficult or otherwise unique images, if no higher resolution could realistically be acquired. This should be explained in the nomination so that it can be taken into consideration.
      • Note that vector graphics in SVG format omit any requirement for any pixel count.
      • Animations and video may be somewhat smaller.
  3. Is among Wikipedia's best work.
    • It is a photograph, diagram, image or animation which is among the best examples of a given subject that the encyclopedia has to offer.
    • It illustrates the subject in a compelling way, making the viewer want to know more. A photograph has appropriate lighting to maximize visible detail; diagrams and other illustrations are clear and informative.
    • A featured picture is not always required to be aesthetically pleasing; it might be shocking, impressive, or just highly informative. Highly graphic, historical and otherwise unique images may not have to be classically beautiful at all. See these examples for a basic guide.
    • commons:Help:Scanning offers advice on preparing non-photographic media (engravings, illustrations from books, etc) in your possession for Wikipedia.
  4. Has a free license. It is available in the public domain or under a free license. Fair use images are not allowed. To check which category a particular image tag falls under, see the list at Wikipedia:File copyright tags.
  5. Adds significant encyclopedic value to an article and helps readers to understand an article.
    • The image is used in one or more articles. [2] It is preferable to wait a reasonable period of time (at least 7 days) after the image is added to the article before nominating it, though this may be ignored in obvious cases, such as replacing a low-resolution version of an image with a higher resolution of the same image.
    • A picture's encyclopedic value (referred to as "EV") is given priority over its artistic value. [3]
  6. Is verifiable. It is supported by facts in the article or references cited on the image page, or is from a source noted for its accuracy. It is not created to propose new original research, such as unpublished ideas or arguments.
  7. Has a descriptive, informative and complete file description in English. A complete file description:
    • Properly identifies the main subject, including Latin and technical names where applicable.
    • Describes the context of the photograph, painting, or other medium. Geotagging photographs of identifiable places is encouraged. This entails providing the coordinates of where the camera was when the medium was recorded to an appropriate degree of precision no less than ~10 km² (see Commons:Geocoding, or Template:Coord if the image is hosted on the English Wikipedia).
    • States the most relevant meta-detail (such as date, location, event, version, etc). It is suggested that additional relevant information that becomes known during the course of the nomination be subsequently included in the file description.
    • May include languages other than English but there must be an English version available that meets this criterion. The file name may be in a language other than English.
  8. Avoids inappropriate digital manipulation.
    • Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in a photographic image is generally acceptable provided it is limited, well-done, and not deceptive.
    • Typical acceptable manipulation includes cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and colour/exposure correction.
    • More extensive manipulation should be clearly described in the image text.
    • Any manipulation which causes the main subject to be misrepresented is unacceptable.
    • Note that this criterion is not relevant to vector-based SVG images, as the entire image is a digital construction.
 The page contains a featured image, sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. File:American World War II senior military officials, 1945.JPEG
  A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. 24th Infantry Division (United States)
  GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. South Dakota
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{ cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be " brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. New York City
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. AFL-CIO
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Article Seven of the United States Constitution
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of capitals in the United States
Category Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:United States
Disambig Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. New Amsterdam (disambiguation)
File Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. File:Flag of the United States.svg
Portal Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class. Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date. Portal:United States
Project All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. Wikipedia:WikiProject United States
Redirect Any redirect falls under this class. The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. List of United States submarine classes
Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. Template:United States topics
NA Any non-article page that fits no other classification. The page contains no article content. Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. User:BrendelSignature/Income inequality in the United States

Importance scale

WikiProject article importance scheme
Importance Criteria Example
  Top Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. United States, New York City, Washington, D.C.
  High Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. Arizona, California, New York
  Mid Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. Fat Man, Federal Communications Commission
  Low Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. 509th Tactical Fighter Squadron
  NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. Template:United States topics
  ??? Subject importance has not yet been assessed. ???

Main CATs to-do

Participants

Please add your name below, using the {{User0|"Your name"}} template.

  1. Yasht101 ( talk)
  2. Agathoclea ( talk)

Individual tallies

Please add the number of articles assessed by you in the score section against your name. Your work will be reviewed by the organizer and will be given barnstars on that bases.

User Score As of (UTC) Categories Awards
Yasht101 ( talk · contribs · count) 0 10 April 2012







Assessed articles of unknown importance

This is a detailed section which makes it a lot more easy to take up work:

Topic/Sub-project Count* Link Volunteer(s) Status
Category:Unknown-importance American animation articles Category:Unknown-importance American animation articles
Category:Unknown-importance American cinema articles Category:Unknown-importance American cinema articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance American music articles Category:Unknown-importance American music articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance American television articles Category:Unknown-importance American television articles
Category:Unknown-importance Arizona articles Category:Unknown-importance Arizona articles
Category:Unknown-importance Arkansas articles Category:Unknown-importance Arkansas articles
Category:Unknown-importance University of Arkansas articles Category:Unknown-importance University of Arkansas articles
Category:Unknown-importance Asian Americans articles Category:Unknown-importance Asian Americans articles
Category:Unknown-importance Colorado articles Category:Unknown-importance Colorado articles
Category:Unknown-importance Delaware articles‎ Category:Unknown-importance Delaware articles
Category:Unknown-importance District of Columbia articles Category:Unknown-importance District of Columbia articles
Category:Unknown-importance FBI articles Category:Unknown-importance FBI articles
Category:Low-importance Franco-Americans articles Category:Low-importance Franco-Americans articles
Category:Unknown-importance Idaho articles Category:Unknown-importance Idaho articles
Category:Unknown-importance Indianapolis articles Category:Unknown-importance Indianapolis articles
Category:Unknown-importance Notre Dame articles Category:Unknown-importance Notre Dame articles
Category:Unknown-importance Kansas articles Category:Unknown-importance Kansas articles
Category:Unknown-importance Kentucky articles Category:Unknown-importance Kentucky articles
Category:Unknown-importance Eastern Mountain Coal Fields task force articles Category:Unknown-importance Eastern Mountain Coal Fields task force articles
Category:Unknown-importance Louisville articles Category:Unknown-importance Louisville articles
Category:Unknown-importance KYOVA Region articles Category:Unknown-importance KYOVA Region articles
Category:Unknown-importance Louisiana Tech articles Category:Unknown-importance Louisiana Tech articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance New Orleans articles Category:Unknown-importance New Orleans articles ‎
Category:Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles Category:Unknown-importance Massachusetts articles
Category:Unknown-importance Boston articles Category:Unknown-importance Boston articles
Category:Unknown-importance Mississippi articles Category:Unknown-importance Mississippi articles
Category:Unknown-importance Nebraska articles Category:Unknown-importance Nebraska articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance Omaha articles Category:Unknown-importance Omaha articles
Category:Unknown-importance New Hampshire articles Category:Unknown-importance New Hampshire articles
Category:Unknown-importance Dartmouth College articles Category:Unknown-importance Dartmouth College articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance New Mexico articles Category:Unknown-importance New Mexico articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance North Carolina articles Category:Unknown-importance North Carolina articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance Ohio articles Category:Unknown-importance Ohio articles
Category:Unknown-importance Mississippi articles Category:Unknown-importance Mississippi articles
Category:Unknown-importance Cincinnati articles Category:Unknown-importance Cincinnati articles
Category:Unknown-importance Rhode Island articles Category:Unknown-importance Rhode Island articles
Category:Unknown-importance September 11, 2001 articles Category:Unknown-importance September 11, 2001 articles‎
Category:Unknown-importance South Carolina articles Category:Unknown-importance South Carolina articles ‎
Category:Unknown-importance Texas articles Category:Unknown-importance Texas articles
Category:Unknown-importance U.S. counties articles Category:Unknown-importance U.S. counties articles
Category:Unknown-importance United States History articles Category:Unknown-importance United States History articles
Category:Unknown-importance Vermont articles Category:Unknown-importance Vermont articles
Category:Unknown-importance Washington articles Category:Unknown-importance Washington articles
Category:Unknown-importance Seattle articles Category:Unknown-importance Seattle articles‎ ‎
Category:Unknown-importance West Virginia articles Category:Unknown-importance West Virginia articles
Category:Unknown-importance Wyoming articles Category:Unknown-importance Wyoming articles

Unassessed article work-list (Alphabetically)

This is a worklist for unassessed articles based on alphabetical order.

Topic/Sub-project Count* Link Volunteer(s) Status
Starting with A http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=A
Starting with B http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=B
Starting with C http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=C
Starting with D http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=D
Starting with E http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=E
Starting with F http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=F
Starting with G http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=G
Starting with H http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=H
Starting with I http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=I
Starting with J http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=J
Starting with K http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=K
Starting with L http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=L
Starting with M http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=M
Starting with N http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=N
Starting with O http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=O
Starting with P http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=P
Starting with Q http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=Q
Starting with R http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=R
Starting with S http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=S
Starting with T http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=T
Starting with U http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=U
Starting with V http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=V
Starting with W http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=W
Starting with X http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=X
Starting with Y http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=Y
Starting with Z http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Category:Unassessed_United_States_articles&from=Z
  1. ^ For example, this image of the Battle of Normandy is grainy, but very few pictures of that event exist. However, where quite a number of pictures exist, for instance, the moon landing, FPC attempts to select the best of the ones produced.
  2. ^ An image has more encyclopedic value (often abbreviated to "EV" or "enc" in discussions) if it contributes strongly to a single article, rather than contributing weakly to many. Adding an image to numerous articles to gain EV is counterproductive and may antagonize both FPC reviewers and article editors.
  3. ^ While effects such as black and white, sepia, oversaturation, and abnormal angles may be visually pleasing, they often detract from the accurate depiction of the subject.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_States/Assessment/Tag_%26_Assess_2012&oldid=1091834842"