- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused after replaced with {{
16TeamBracket}} per precedent. KHL bracket templates were substed and used
WP:LST. Also
MOS:COLOR. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 23:16, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Delete. This squad list from 2016 is irrelevant, as the club sold away its right to play on the elite level in 2022. The club as such may still exist, but the team has been replaced by
Casric Stars F.C..
2A01:799:19A1:C100:ACA1:5BE2:B8B6:F2C5 (
talk) 20:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused after substed and wrapped with section labels. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 14:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep.
✗
plicit 02:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Both unused and had the asked the creator if he had intended to use them, which he did, but it's been a year later and it hasn't. Both can be userfied if he wants them to be kept in his user space.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 01:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused s-line templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 13:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 12:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Replaced last 3 transclustions to use
Module:Adjacent stations/Osaka Metro. Now unsed.
Gonnym (
talk) 10:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused s-line templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 10:23, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused s-line templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 10:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 02:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template only used on two pages, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Recommend substituting and deleting.
fuzzy510 (
talk) 02:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 02:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template only used on one page, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Recommend substituting and deleting.
fuzzy510 (
talk) 02:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Transclude as being used on 2 articles. Both instances should be exactly alike.
Howard the Duck (
talk) 04:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Subst per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 00:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Subst and delete purely static content, not worth trancluding. While both should be alike there's no reason to expect editors of the articles they are substed to to want them to diverge, and if they do no reason to interfere with the normal editing process.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 04:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- substitute and delete and use
WP:LST or
Template:Excerpt to share between articles.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- substitute and delete per Frietjes.
Nigej (
talk) 04:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 02:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template only used on two pages, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Recommend substituting and deleting.
fuzzy510 (
talk) 01:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Transclude as being used on 2 articles. Both instances should be exactly alike.
Howard the Duck (
talk) 04:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Subst per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 00:59, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Subst and delete purely static content, not worth trancluding. While both should be alike there's no reason to expect editors of the articles they are substed to to want them to diverge, and if they do no reason to interfere with the normal editing process.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 04:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- substitute and delete and use
WP:LST or
Template:Excerpt to share between articles.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:33, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- substitute and delete per Frietjes.
Nigej (
talk) 04:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).