- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Apparently used solely in 2009 timeframe. The links also no longer work as Toolserver is no longer used. Suggest complete deletion.
Izno (
talk) 17:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Only two mainspace uses, not generally appropriate for any section besides the elinks section, where we would want a less general search anyway.
We have
Template:Find sources for non-mainspace uses.
Delete entirely.
Izno (
talk) 17:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
One archived talk space use. Suggest subst and delete.
Izno (
talk) 17:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
Izno (
talk) 17:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 17:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution like the other CIS football top10 tables
Frietjes (
talk) 16:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
I’m not sure what on earth purpose these serve. Each Survivor voting table is used on precisely one page each. This user copied the tables from each page into his template and then replaced each table with a unique template. Why? That just creates an additional hurdle if the table should ever need to be modified.
Bgsu98
(Talk) 12:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. This approach makes it more difficult for editors (and near impossible for casual/drive-by editors) to edit...although, perhaps that is the purpose? Templates "allow for the repetition of information", but these are only useable on a single article.
Schazjmd
(talk) 15:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Comment to closer: if deleted, please delete all sub pages.
Gonnym (
talk) 17:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused infobox template. Even if it were used it should be used directly inside the article and not as a stand-alone template.
Gonnym (
talk) 12:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused with all red links other than main article. Can't be used to navigation.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
Cabinet of Eduard Heger uses different data.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused recently created reference template. Doesn't seem to be a generalized source so can't see any real usage for this.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused disambiguation text.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- No objection. (In fact, I can't even remember why I created it in the first place.)
Useddenim (
talk) 13:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused article text in a template.
Gonnym (
talk) 11:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
The project was
deleted 12 years ago but the template was turned into a redirect instead of replacing. That left this template and
Template:WikiProject Food and drink on the same page. This also should not be left as a redirect as it might lead to more editors adding both in the future. Usages should be replaced and this deleted.
Gonnym (
talk) 09:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).