From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 6

Template:WP:CHM ACR/Toolbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Apparently used solely in 2009 timeframe. The links also no longer work as Toolserver is no longer used. Suggest complete deletion. Izno ( talk) 17:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikisearchbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Only two mainspace uses, not generally appropriate for any section besides the elinks section, where we would want a less general search anyway.

We have Template:Find sources for non-mainspace uses.

Delete entirely. Izno ( talk) 17:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikigames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

One archived talk space use. Suggest subst and delete. Izno ( talk) 17:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wheelchair rugby at the Summer Paralympics category navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. Izno ( talk) 17:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2012 CIS football top10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 17:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

unused after being merged with the parent article with attribution like the other CIS football top10 tables Frietjes ( talk) 16:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SurvivorVotingHistoryTable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I’m not sure what on earth purpose these serve. Each Survivor voting table is used on precisely one page each. This user copied the tables from each page into his template and then replaced each table with a unique template. Why? That just creates an additional hurdle if the table should ever need to be modified. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete. This approach makes it more difficult for editors (and near impossible for casual/drive-by editors) to edit...although, perhaps that is the purpose? Templates "allow for the repetition of information", but these are only useable on a single article. Schazjmd  (talk) 15:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply
Comment to closer: if deleted, please delete all sub pages. Gonnym ( talk) 17:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:German Civil War (1918) Infobox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused infobox template. Even if it were used it should be used directly inside the article and not as a stand-alone template. Gonnym ( talk) 12:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Hungarian–Romanian War

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused with all red links other than main article. Can't be used to navigation. Gonnym ( talk) 11:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cabinet of Eduard Heger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused. Cabinet of Eduard Heger uses different data. Gonnym ( talk) 11:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Book archive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused recently created reference template. Doesn't seem to be a generalized source so can't see any real usage for this. Gonnym ( talk) 11:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beaufort railway station DAB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused disambiguation text. Gonnym ( talk) 11:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

No objection. (In fact, I can't even remember why I created it in the first place.) Useddenim ( talk) 13:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Attack and Seize the Roncesvalles Pass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Unused article text in a template. Gonnym ( talk) 11:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Coca-Cola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The project was deleted 12 years ago but the template was turned into a redirect instead of replacing. That left this template and Template:WikiProject Food and drink on the same page. This also should not be left as a redirect as it might lead to more editors adding both in the future. Usages should be replaced and this deleted. Gonnym ( talk) 09:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).