- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template redirect that is not in use anywhere. No incoming links except for
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index and
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index/Linkshere, two pages populated by scripts I wrote to catalog Signpost pages that have no incoming links. One of my major projects as editor-in-chief is to harmonize the use of templates and pages, as the existence of numerous redundant templates (deprecated, never used, or created at the wrong title by typos) poses a large obstacle to navigating or editing Signpost templates. For example, old Signpost articles (from 2005 to 2009) were never properly indexed by the module, because they used strange idiosyncratic header templates, which I recently fixed, allowing me to write a script which updated the module with their titles, authors and tags. Someone has requested that I list these at XFD pages individually rather than nominate them for speedy deletion.
jp×
g 23:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The rational, especially given by the editor-in-chief of the project, is very strong. I agree that having unused templates makes maintenance always harder.
Gonnym (
talk) 15:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:31, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template redirect that is not in use anywhere. No incoming links except for
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index and
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Omni-index/Linkshere, two pages populated by scripts I wrote to catalog Signpost pages that have no incoming links. One of my major projects as editor-in-chief is to harmonize the use of templates and pages, as the existence of numerous redundant templates (deprecated, never used, or created at the wrong title by typos) poses a large obstacle to navigating or editing Signpost templates. For example, old Signpost articles (from 2005 to 2009) were never properly indexed by the module, because they used strange idiosyncratic header templates, which I recently fixed, allowing me to write a script which updated the module with their titles, authors and tags. Someone has requested that I list these at XFD pages individually rather than nominate them for speedy deletion.
jp×
g 23:51, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The rational, especially given by the editor-in-chief of the project, is very strong. I agree that having unused templates makes maintenance always harder.
Gonnym (
talk) 15:15, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
No longer used after the category mergers of years into decades of the women's baseball categories on
December 28 and has been replaced by
Template:YYY0s in women's baseball category header.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
This template isn't even used! There isn't even a squad list at
Olympique de Médéa
Govvy (
talk) 20:38, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 01:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
Giant
Snowman 20:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as not used, but no prejudice to restoring if/when a current squad list if populated.
Giant
Snowman 20:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 17:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
merged with
Timrå IK
Frietjes (
talk) 17:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
merged with
Malmö Redhawks
Frietjes (
talk) 17:48, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
merged with
Färjestad BK
Frietjes (
talk) 17:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Per
User:Snowflake91's comment on 8 January 2023, this club was dissolved in 2015. It, therefore, has no 'current squad'.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider) 16:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 January 24.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Simple link template only used on 3 articles with no documentation. This serves to make articles harder to read for little benefit. Subst and delete.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- OK, I apparently created this template and have no objection to the above proposal.
W. P. Uzer (
talk) 08:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Subst per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template serves no useful purpose now that
Wikipedia:Trust network is marked as historical. Subst and delete.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Redundant to {{
navseasoncats}}.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Delete. Should have been removed when the
BSicon catalogs were moved to Commons, but somehow got overlooked.
Useddenim (
talk) 14:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Only used in one archived talk page discussion. Created in 2016. Subst and delete.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 02:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:14, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Not enough complexity to warrant a template. Only 5 uses. Subst and delete.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 01:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Purely static (no edits since 2014 other than uncategorized template patrol) article content used on only 2 articles. Subst and delete.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 01:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Now redundant to {{
Television franchise episode count}}. --
Alex_21
TALK 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Now redundant to {{
Television franchise episode count}}. --
Alex_21
TALK 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Now redundant to {{
Television franchise episode count}}. --
Alex_21
TALK 01:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).