- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to
Template:Righeira as redundant to it.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 23:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:Righeira singles with
Template:Righeira.
No need for a separate singles navbox when {{
Righeira}} lists the same songs and is more than sufficient for navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me 22:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete as unused and superseded.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 22:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused and superseded by
Module:Adjacent stations/Rhine-Ruhr S-Bahn.
Gonnym (
talk) 20:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unnecessary given existence of {{
Wikidata}}; recently created by someone blocked for template-space disruption.
Elli (
talk |
contribs) 18:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Doesn't appear to work, the documentation page is just plagiarised from another template and doesn't actually have any relevance to this page, saves no typing compared to
{{wikidata|alias}}
which is actually functional, I'm struggling to think of any situations where "getting a random synonym for the page title from wikidata" would actually be useful.
192.76.8.85 (
talk) 03:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:39, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused template recently created by someone blocked for disruption in template-space. No apparent use.
Elli (
talk |
contribs) 18:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- If implemented properly I think this could potentially be a useful wrapper, but the current implementation is completely non functional.
192.76.8.85 (
talk) 03:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Two articles outside the main subject. Fails NENAN.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nominator's rationale.
NatureBoyMD (
talk) 12:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 July 12.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 23:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused and unnecessary template. No games were played in 2021. Thus, no standings.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 16:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 July 12.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 19:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused military rank template.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Single-use. Subst on
2020–21 New Zealand Football Championship.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete as unused duplicates of already-in-use non-templated tables.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 19:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
All unused as the information is now part of the
2021 New Zealand National League. No need for these templates anymore.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete as single-use.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 19:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Single-use. Subst on
2012 Parramatta Eels season.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Subsitute and delete. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 16:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused squad box template.
2009 Parramatta Eels season has the list of players in a different style. Probably should be substituted on the article.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Subsitute and delete. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 16:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 16:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nomination. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 17:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:47, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion replaced. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 16:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Single-use template replaced with {{
Infobox FIVB tournament}}. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 15:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to
Template:Infobox college football game.
Primefac (
talk) 11:35, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:Infobox college football single game,
Template:Infobox college football single game mini header,
Template:Infobox NCAA football yearly game and
Template:Infobox NCAA FCS football yearly game into
Template:Infobox college football game.
Five different infobox templates to achieve the same infobox template for a football game is overly unnecessary. Much easier to consolidate these templates into a single standardized infobox. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 13:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Merge per nomination. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:36, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- If this is done, please make sure that functionality is preserved and that articles are not broken as a result. These five templates have different functionality and different parameters. It's fine to merge them as long as it is done thoughtfully and without breaking uses. --
B (
talk) 12:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose - the difference in parameters between them and the opportunity for things to get messed up worries me.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 17:29, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- It'll be tested and rolled back if issues arise. That's not a valid reason to oppose. And many are already
wrapper templates of {{
Infobox college football game}} so the merge should be straightforward for those. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 18:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Merge all of course checking that no functionality is lost/broken when doing so. Ridiculously many templates for this currently.
Joseph
2302 (
talk) 07:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 23:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
The club Royal Excel Mouscron no longer exists; it was dissolved. This template is no longer useful because it is supposed to include current members of the club's squad. However, the club has no squad because it doesn't exist. So, delete.
Paul Vaurie (
talk) 13:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
Giant
Snowman 21:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - no club = no current squad = no need for a squad navbox.
Giant
Snowman 21:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to
Template:Infobox college track and field team , though if leaving off the "team" is desirable from a "brevity" standpoint, feel free to merge it back that way (and if not, leave a redirect in place?).
Primefac (
talk) 11:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:Infobox college track and field with
Template:Infobox college track and field team.
Duplicate template. –
Aidan721 (
talk) 12:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Merge There doesn't seem to be any significant difference between the pages that use one template and the pages that use the other, so it would make sense for all of them to look the same. (I don't have any opinion on which template's code or rendered appearance is better, so don't mind which way the merge is done.) Note that the templates are USA-specific, and it might make sense to mention that in their names. --
ais523 20:45, 6 July 2022 (
U
T
C)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused rail station wrapper.
Gonnym (
talk) 07:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Subst and delete. It doesn't seem worth having a template wrapper to hardcode one parameter, especially one with such a short name – if something similar were done for every rail system in the world, we would rapidly run out of short template names (and also confuse the users who worked on the articles). As such, it would need a longer name (something like {{
Kyiv Metro station link}}) to be usable, but that isn't any shorter or clearer than {{
station link|Kyiv Metro}}, so there's no real value to having a template here at all.
This is currently unused, but if anyone adds a use while the TfD is in progress, the use should be substed rather than removed. --
ais523 20:06, 6 July 2022 (
U
T
C)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete under
WP:G8, though one could just as easily make the argument that a sandbox does not strictly need deleting and could be blanked. However, this is an unusually-named sandbox/subpage so I see no reason why this discussion needs to extend further.
Primefac (
talk) 09:51, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused sandbox using a
module that was deleted.
Gonnym (
talk) 07:23, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom, I suspect this could be G8'd as a sandbox for a deleted page.
192.76.8.85 (
talk) 11:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete It would make sense to expand
WP:CSD#G8 to handle this case too, although it currently isn't listed as an example. --
ais523 20:08, 6 July 2022 (
U
T
C)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:55, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
While this not being used is very likely, the fact that it isn't linked from any page, does not have a talk page and the template's only editor is its creator suggests this is not something the community is using.
Gonnym (
talk) 07:10, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete This seems like it would be connected to some "informal mediation" process, but all of those appear to have shut down: it links to
Wikipedia:Mediation which in turn links to
Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal,
Wikipedia:Requests for mediation and
Wikipedia:Mediation Committee, all of which are now inactive. So it seems like this is the sort of thing which, if it were to be used, we'd want some sort of community guidelines about how to use it, and reflect those in the template. (With so many failed attempts, it's probably necessary to work out what we're doing wrong before trying again!) We don't have those, so there's nothing to reflect. --
ais523 21:15, 6 July 2022 (
U
T
C)
- Oh, I just realised that the current location is
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, which doesn't need this template. So my reasoning was slightly off, but not the conclusion. --
ais523 21:17, 6 July 2022 (
U
T
C)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused United Kingdom cadet forces templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 07:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- And
Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/VCC. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused link list template.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per
WP:G7
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 11:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused and superseded by
Module:Adjacent stations/Qbuzz Stoptrein.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:46, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused bus succession templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused bus succession templates.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:36, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused banner which should never be used on pages anyways.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Support I am an organizer for this project. This template was never used and will never be used because it describes activity which happens at Meta-Wiki.
Bluerasberry
(talk) 02:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 July 14.
Primefac (
talk) 11:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 10:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused citation.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused table.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Outdated, unused, most of the links in it don't make a lot of sense, I can't think of any realistic use for a comparison of two politician's 2006 era views on a range of issues.
192.76.8.85 (
talk) 11:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused citation.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused image.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:28, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused map and table.
Constituencies of Finland uses a different set.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 11:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unused external link template.
Gonnym (
talk) 06:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Single-use World Championships in Athletics medalists templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2022 July 14.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung,
mello
hi! (
投稿) 06:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).