The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was moved page notice. Result of an article page rename. P.I. Ellsworth ,  ed.  ^put'r there 14:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC) reply

• Template:Editnotices/Page/United States debt-ceiling crisis of 2011 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Wow ( talk) 08:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC) reply

• Template:DCI Former Classes Champions ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation template with few links (and those there are are already linked from Template:Drum Corps International. Information is already present at Drum Corps International#Past champions. Why? I Ask ( talk) 07:16, 16 December 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:26, 21 December 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno ( talk) 16:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC) reply

• Template:Drum Corps International World Class Champions ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't see a need for this template when we already have Template:Drum Corps International and the page Drum Corps International World Class Champions for navigation. Why? I Ask ( talk) 07:06, 16 December 2022 (UTC) reply

• Keep. This template appears to meet the criteria for a valid navbox. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 15:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination. All the links are already on the Drum Crops International navbox. No articles on the championships exist. This doesn't do anything for navigation on its own. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination; unnecessary template. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 05:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC) reply

• Template:Uw-dttr2 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Uw-dttr3 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There was a discussion earlier which bundled this and dttr3 along with dttr4im. Dttr4im is a humour template, and appears to have confused the discussion somewhat. Based on my reading of that discussion, had dttr4im been excluded from the discussion, it would've ended with dttr2 and 3 being redirected or deleted.

Dttr2 and dttr3 are not humourous, they are serious, which is a bit odd when the first and last templates in the series are humour templates. Dttr2 is basically a duplicate of {{ Uw-tempabuse2}}, serving the same purpose, abusive use of warning templates.

The "tempabuse" series switches to {{ Uw-disruptive3}} for level 3. If an editor is going around abusing templates after two prior warnings, then dttr3 is probably not going to be the best template anyway. Dttr3 is therefore functionally a duplicate of uw-disruptive3

Whether an editor has a "high edit count" is, quite frankly, irrelevant when deciding if they should be templated. WP:DTTR is by no means widely accepted, and should absolutely NOT be enforced with templates which unironically say that editors with high edit counts should not be templated. Mako001  (C)   (T)  🇺🇦 02:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 18:26, 18 December 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. Template reads like a redundancy of Template:Uw-tempabuse1, and being a "regular" or having a "high edit count" implies special privileges that don't exist. This template does not appear to imply humour, when compared to other templates such as Template:Uw-dttr or Template:Trout. —  CJDOS, Sheridan, OR ( talk) 12:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC) (edited 12:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).