The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
not enough main article links for a navbox; only one entry --
AquaDTRS (
talk) 17:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete the broad title is somewhat misleading for a navbox with just one entry.--
Tom (LT) (
talk) 04:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Unsourced BLP. Not a template. Creator seems to object to this being in draft space.
Adam9007 (
talk) 02:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete. Page unambiguously created in wrong namespace. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 03:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete. Serves no purpose.
Fleet Lists (
talk) 05:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Redundant predecessor to
Tammy Danagogo in wrong namespace. --
Bsherr (
talk) 21:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Sydney Metro templates
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).