November 7
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 00:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Only two independent articles (one for the band and one for its lead singer), which already link to and from each other. Mostly, a discography page in a navbox without navigational benefit. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me 21:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. All the albums redirect to the band. Useless. --
wooden
superman 10:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 00:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Back in 2006 it might have been useful, but it's 2017 now. Someone at the talk page said it best: "This warning is as useful as a warning that says "there are images on this page; you need support for rendering to view images otherwise you will see empty boxes".".
Timmyshin (
talk) 20:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- delete. I an sure this was discussed somewhere recently on WP but I can’t recall where. It’s hard to think now who would be reading WP on a platform that does not support Chinese automatically: all modern consumer mobile and desktop OSes support Chinese and have done for a decade or so. Articles with Chinese text normally have a link such as that provided by {{
zh}}, e.g.
Chinese: 中国; that is enough to help readers utterly unfamiliar with the language.--
JohnBlackburne
words
deeds 08:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- I found a discussion:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_China/Archive_28#Little_boxes.2C_little_boxes. BTW I think the Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, Thai, Cyrillic, Hebrew, Arabic and many other such templates should also go. Perhaps texts like Burmese can stay a little longer.
Timmyshin (
talk) 12:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- They were not nominated at the same time, so I would say let this discussion run its course, then the points raised in this discussion will help with any discussion concerning them.--
JohnBlackburne
words
deeds 12:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- delete, doesn't add much value and contributes to clutter at the top of the article.
Frietjes (
talk) 13:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- delete – no longer useful, and the articles that use it are typically already cluttered with boxes.
Kanguole 16:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Too much clutter for a warning that will only be an issue for a very small fraction of readers.
Spellcast (
talk) 10:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Smacks of almost a weird foreign bias in addition.
2610:130:104:900:7998:98C1:2C2D:18E0 (
talk) 15:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- That doesn't make any sense. Can you explain your reasoning?
108.220.198.237 (
talk) 00:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- I think they mean that it suggests that the reader is someone who doesn't regularly use, read, or otherwise work with Chinese text. —
Mr. Guye (
talk) (
contribs) 19:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Look, it's 2017. It just isn't useful. It's a problem for very little, if any, portion of Wikipedia users, and it also says 'you may see empty boxes', which is never true.
82.42.112.140 (
talk) 07:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The disclaimer is more unnecessary clutter than something of value, because those without "proper rendering support" would be in a exceedingly small group. And I can't imagine that there would be a lot of confusion of what kind of text would generally be in Chinese-related articles/sections with some common sense, certainly not enough to clutter articles with this disclaimer box. --
Cold Season (
talk) 17:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Unnecessary disclaimer. Delete it. -
Bokmanrocks01 (
talk) 04:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. There was a discussion where the consensus was it's no longer useful, and I've removed the template from dozens of pages. -
Zanhe (
talk) 05:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Robust Unicode support is pervasive in 2017.
Brandon (
talk) 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Unnecessay in 2017 --
Eflyjason (
talk) 08:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Disclaimer no longer necessary with robust Chinese text support on all modern computing platforms.
Horserice (
talk) 08:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete No longer needed as it is outdated.
Ernestchuajiasheng (
talk) 12:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Quebec school board election results
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 00:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 1998, Ward Eight (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 1998/Position/Trustee, District Sixteen (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2003, Ward Eight (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2003, Ward Eleven (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2003/Position/Trustee, District Sixteen (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2007, Ward Eight (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2007, Ward Eleven (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de la Pointe-de-l'Île election, 2007/Position/Trustee, District Sixteen (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de Montréal election, 1998, Ward Nineteen (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire de Montréal election, 1998, Ward Ten (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire Jérôme-Le Royer election, 1990, Ward Eleven (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire Jérôme-Le Royer election, 1990, Ward Fourteen (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire Jérôme-Le Royer election, 1990, Ward Sixteen (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire Jérôme-Le Royer election, 1994, Ward Eight (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire Jérôme-Le Royer election, 1994, Ward Eleven (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Commission scolaire Jérôme-Le Royer election, 1994, Ward Ten (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Montreal Catholic School Board election, 1994, Ward Two (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1977/Commissioner, Ward Ten (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1980/Commissioner, Ward Ten (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1983/Commissioner, Ward Ten (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1987/Commissioner, Ward Ten (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Montreal Catholic School Commission election, 1990/Commissioner, Ward Ten (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
School board elections are not encyclopedically notable in their own right; standalone articles about many of these elections were deleted a few years ago and aren't coming back. And since a school board trustee would not be considered notable for that fact in and of itself either, the only way anybody named in these templates would ever have an article to use them on is if they subsequently went on to hold a more notable office, such as on
Montreal City Council, in the
National Assembly of Quebec or in the
House of Commons of Canada — and even for the few who did, there's no value in retaining early school board election results as part of their "electoral history" — we're only interested in their electoral history as it pertains to those notable offices, not as it pertains to school board elections that we're not maintaining articles about.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- I disagree with the argument that there's no value in retaining school board election results in the electoral history of notable individuals (this should perhaps be the subject of another discussion), but I agree there's no point in keeping these templates.
CJCurrie (
talk) 03:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- delete. A strange way to present the information in them. If a noteworthy aspect of a person’s biography it should be worked into the text where its relevance will be clearer from the context, not presented in a table with only one entry.--
JohnBlackburne
words
deeds 13:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
unused icon template
Frietjes (
talk) 18:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Template:POTD image/2007-01-01
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 00:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
these are all unused and redundant. for example, {{POTD/2007-01-01|image}}
, {{POTD/2007-01-01|size}}
, {{POTD/2007-01-01|title}}
replaces {{POTD image/2007-01-01}}
, {{POTD size/2007-01-01}}
, {{POTD title/2007-01-01}}
respectively.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. IIRC these were created when we were working out how best to do the templates. This was one of the candidates, but was not chosen. —
howcheng {
chat} 23:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
WP:SOFTDELETE.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 00:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Only one notable release. --
wooden
superman 14:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 00:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
No notable releases. Only links (some) band members. --
wooden
superman 14:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - Not enough entries to warrant a navigation template (band with no notable releases currently.) If anything, I see this trending downward too, as the only two band members with articles appears to be minimally sourced
WP:BLP stubs.
Sergecross73
msg me 18:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Deleted per
WP:CSD#G7, based on comments by BoonDock (original page creator) below. All other editors' contribs were not significant.
Floquenbeam (
talk) 20:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 14:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
not clear where this would be needed
Frietjes (
talk) 14:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
old, unused, and not needed
Frietjes (
talk) 14:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
unused, probably redundant to {{
rint}} if it's needed at all
Frietjes (
talk) 14:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by
Fastily (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 03:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
unused, created back in 2014 for testing, no clear purpose
Frietjes (
talk) 14:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 14:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
Fails most of the points
WP:NAVBOX. No article, the songs don't refer to one another, etc. Best left for the category. --
wooden
superman 13:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Nihlus 00:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
duplicate of
Template:2017 Big Sky football standings
Joeykai (
talk) 01:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).