The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep - there are enough articles where he's the principal actor and not part of a large team. (nac)
Alakzi (
talk) 01:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Template creep: navbox that summarizes the CV of an (admittedly high-profile) computer programmer. All articles linked from this template already link to Pike and many of them have several other navboxes.
QVVERTYVS (
hm?) 08:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)reply
I don't understand where Template Creep applies—there's but a single template on the page, and the "Avoid template creep" essay is about "the tendency for some Wikipedia articles ... to become gradually cluttered with templates".
Curly Turkey¡gobble! 08:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)reply
You're saying that three navboxes is too many? That's a bit hard to swallow—it's not even enough to justify a {{navboxes}}.
Curly Turkey¡gobble! 20:13, 22 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - There appear to be enough articles with strong enough ties to support a navbox. Sometimes people will want to go from one subject to another without going through Pike's article; the navbox allows this. —
Chris Woodrich (
talk) 04:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Alakzi (
talk) 14:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.