The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Hotels and Pension House ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

navigates nothing. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, G11 - spam link, not transcluded, unlikely that there will be articles. mabdul 11:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Delete. I don't see any purpose for it other than to list loosely associated topics. Xeltran ( talk) 20:29, 5 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Hoffman-Manning song ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hoffman-Manning-plus song ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused boilerplate. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, useless. mabdul 11:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Historical GDP of Romania ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, unused. mabdul 11:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Hide title part ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, unused and I hate title changes. mabdul 12:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merged with {{ hexadecimal}}  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:54, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Hexdigit ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and replaced by one of the many {{ dec2hex}} templates. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Keep clearly different from all of those, since it shows only one digit, and does not specify a prefix or suffix. {{ dec2hex}} shows a prefix "0x" and {{ hexadecimal}} shows at least two digits when specified using "no" suffix. Merge into {{ hexadecimal}}, by making it display one digit. 70.49.124.225 ( talk) 03:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply

*Delete, if it is worth, then merge it as it is only usable for one digit, see: {{ hexdigit|18}}. mabdul 12:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

• • Comment the other templates mentioned do not work for only one digit in a simple digit display (they have markup or make a two digit output), so a merge seems appropriate. 70.49.124.225 ( talk) 03:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
    • 12 is working, so what needs to be merged? mabdul 09:08, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
      • {{hexadecimal|12|no}} 0C is not working like "hexdigit", if it were it would show {{hexdigit|12}} C and neither does {{Dec2hex|12|digits=1}} 0xC -- they both have an excess of characters. 70.49.124.225 ( talk) 12:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
        • mmmh, correct - as the documentation correctly states, the minimum are always two digits --> Merge mabdul 13:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
• comment, I have added this feature to {{ hexadecimal}} so {{hexadecimal|12|digit}} C works without padding. Frietjes ( talk) 16:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Heroteamlist ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:HeroteamlistStart ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:HeroteamlistEnd ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, unused. mabdul 12:28, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Heroj M ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and not clear why we need it. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, not English and no translation in the doc. mabdul 12:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:03, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Heroes Game Trophy ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, it is a wrapper using another (used) template, but unused and hardly will ever used since it is Iowa-related. mabdul 12:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Helpboxrow ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:24, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, unused HTML table part, which is always better using a wikitable format. mabdul 12:39, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Heath aeroengines ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

all red links. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, unused. mabdul 12:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Hbf intro ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused boilerplate. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 22:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, never understood the boilerplates use. (was created looong ago - so maybe it was for mass creating articles). mabdul 12:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:05, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Category tree navbox ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 19:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, navbox for cats? We have cats for that! mabdul 12:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:POTD row ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

doesn't appear to be in use except for a handful of old mainpage redesign proposals. we could certainly move it to project space to preserve these. the main problem with it currently is that it is creating a bunch of errors due to the category stuff at the bottom of the template. at first I thought it might be a substituted template, but that doesn't make sense given the number of parserfunctions in it. Would make more sense to have it in project space and/or remove add an option to remove the category. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 16:50, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Speedy keep. This template is used to create the POTD templates for the Main Page. — howcheng { chat} 19:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply
• Speedy keep Anything used on or for the Main Page is not subject to deletion, except for illegal things like copyvios; please attempt to get consensus at Talk:Main Page or another relevant talk page for stopping the use of this template. Nyttend ( talk) 00:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep. As others have stated, this template is used to create the Featured Picture templates for the Main page. The lack of pages listed on Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:POTD row is due to fact that users are suppose to substitute the template using {{subst:POTD row}} instead of {{POTD row}} directly (like the user talk message templates). Without the template substitution, numerous meta-templates will unnecessarily go under cascading protection (for example, see this edit summary). By the way, many of the parserfunctions are used to help automatically resize the file if it a panorama image, among others. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 02:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep - "at first I thought it might be a substituted template" - then read the documentation page, it is a subst template! mabdul 11:36, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant to either {{ anchor}} or {{ visible anchor}}.  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Anchor2 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to template:vanchor. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 16:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Comment it is not equivalent, since vanchor creates an anchor at the visible text, while anchor2 does not, if a different visible text is specified from the anchor name. There should be a merger between vanchor, {{ anchor}} and anchor2. 70.49.124.225 ( talk) 03:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply
  • While that is true, here a simplified example ([[#bar]] is the generated anchor ;-) ):
    • {{vanchor|foo|bar|baz}} --> foo [[#foo]][[#bar]][[#baz]]
    • {{anchor2|foo|bar}} --> foo [[#bar]]
  • and thus only an additional anchor is created which is not harming anybody. (anchor 2 has only the possibility to create one anchor)

  That is not true, since if you already have an anchor called "#bar" later in the text, this initial usage will break linking to the later anchor. 70.49.124.225 ( talk) 03:54, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete per above. mabdul 13:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Report-nav ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

broken since there is no template:nav. 198.102.153.2 ( talk) 15:46, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Well report-nav was made years ago, and nav was only created and delete a day back. So perhaps this is still not finished yet. I am declining the speedy deletion. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 12:23, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply

It still falls under speedy as it creates stuff in the Report: space which does not exist. As it's unused and unlinked in its 2 years of existence, it is clearly G6 and/or G8. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 18:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, although I see what the user wanted to achieve (and it is broken now), it is unused although it was created back in 2010 and so likely not possible to populate. mabdul 14:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Aum ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, I can't really see a purpose for this. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 08:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Although the function is obvious, I agree that in practice it will always be better to link to the article from a Latin title if required. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) ( talk) 11:34, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply
• Delete, everybody can use {{ script}} as used in that template. (and it is unused) mabdul 11:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jafeluv ( talk) 11:35, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:Largest cities of Hawaii ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Largest cities of Georgia (U.S. state) ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Largest cities of Texas ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Largest cities of Michigan ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Largest cities of Alabama ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Largest cities of Alaska ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Largest cities and towns of Connecticut ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nominator statement: Normal use is for countries, not for states. Based on an unreliable source (personal website) Night of the Big Wind _talk 14:30, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Nominator statement: See Hawaii#Law and government. There is a lack of separate cities in the entire state of Hawaii. Honolulu is the only incorporated city in the state. Everything else is either an unincorporated place or a census-designated place. Even the citation link listed on this template includes this fact, listing only Honolulu as a city while everything else is an "Uninc" (short for unincorporated place). If we must keep such a template, either {{ Largest cities}} should be modified so an extra parameter can change the header, or another meta-template should be used. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 04:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Delete, along with possibly hundreds similar created by same user; geonames.org is a Wiki, not a reliable source, see ANI. [1] This is going to need coordinated admin cleanup and deletion, there are too many for individual AFDs, and as far as I can tell, none of them are reliable. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Can't all of these templates be rolled into one TFD? There are hundreds, all based on non-reliable sources. My declaration is to delete all of them. See ANI: [2] Not only are they based on non-reliable sources, but the notion of 10 largest cities isn't appropriate for many articles where they were added, they often replaced reliably sourced data and disrupted flow of the article, and they are sometimes undue. Lots of problems: the generic {{ Largest cities}} can be adapted on individual articles if warranted. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 14:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Delete as grossly inaccurate. I live in Hawaii; Honolulu comprises eight of the "cities" listed, so those other seven "cities" have got to go right there. I also agree with Sandy "Delete, along with possibly hundreds similar created by same user; geonames.org is a Wiki, not a reliable source, see ANI. [3] This is going to need coordinated admin cleanup and deletion, there are too many for individual AFDs, and as far as I can tell, none of them are reliable." Softlavender ( talk) 10:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Delete all "Largest cities" templates for individual U.S. states. As near as I can determine there wasn't a felt need for these templates, and the terminology "cities" is wrong for several of the states. Also, as Sandy notes, these lists are for the most part based on non-RS sources that should not be cited. (However, the numbers that I've checked are actually OK.) -- Orlady ( talk) 19:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Weak delete though the Connecticut one has a proper reference and the numbers are accurate. Best, Markvs88 ( talk) 21:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Each US state template has a section for largest cities (and sometimes other municipalities, if applicable), so these templates are redundant. Nyttend ( talk) 00:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Alabama, Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii - unused; Subst and delete Georgia, Texas and Michigan and discuss the content problem on the related talk pages. mabdul 11:23, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete  Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Template:AAHL Arenas ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:AAHL. Jenks24 ( talk) 01:25, 30 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Delete, totally redundant. mabdul 11:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC) reply
• Delete Redundant, not even useful given there are only two links actually relevant to the article title. Reso lute 00:33, 4 May 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.