October 24
Unused Template:Infobox Canadian political party/ templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 22:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Infobox catalan city (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Redundant to infobox settlement. Also a bit suspcious of the indication it is a seperate country, looks like Catalan seperatism to me...
Himalayan 21:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and replace with {{
Infobox settlement}}. A city is a clear case of a settlement, and it is undesirable for settlement templates to be regionalized down to the sub-national level. (Imagine the proliferation of redundant templates that approach would create: Infobox Ontario city, Infobox Norfolk city, Infobox Aquitaine city, etc.) --
RL0919 (
talk) 20:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 14:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Infobox City Philippines (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
-
Template:Infobox Philippine province (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Redundant to infobox settlement as evidence by the top 20 cities in Philippines like
Manila etc. Pin maps are easily displayed in standard too. Province templates also redundant..
Himalayan 19:49, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- How many templates redundant to infobox settlement are left out there? --
Magioladitis (
talk) 23:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Delete both as redundant to the widely used and more complete
{{Infobox settlement}}
. --
RL0919 (
talk) 17:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by
OverlordQ (
talk ·
contribs) with a reason of "
G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Closing this discussion since OverlordQ seems to have overlooked that detail. (Non-admin closure.) --
RL0919 (
talk) 15:04, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:19 Entertainment (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Unused and useless template. It appears to be a summary which has no purpose when transcluding.
Zoo
Fari 16:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as unused and redundant
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 16:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:AT Coasters (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Redundant with {{
Alton Towers}}.
Locos
epraix ~
Beastepraix 05:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep, but redirect Template:A type submarine.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 14:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Type A submarine (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Redundant with {{
A type submarine}}.
Locos
epraix ~
Beastepraix 05:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 16:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Armcore Project (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Red/wrong links. Unused.
Locos
epraix ~
Beastepraix 04:58, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. No main article and the few valid links are to articles unrelated to the band. --
RL0919 (
talk) 15:46, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.