Ekdaliann fan ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

08 April 2024

– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Banabhatta I ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

User User:Banabhatta I and User:Ekdaliann fan both are same person reverting their vandalized edits and vandalizing other articles with out source. Banabhatta I reverted the edits of User:kashmiri to the edit of his previous sock User:Kalnemi. This user currently have 3-4 more sock accounts and mainly push their POV caste version i.e. of Kanyakubja Brahmins. As you already know who I am , I just want the admins that don't block me and allow me to help to counter this sock as I am able to find that there are 2 people also with him. I will never edit any article I will just counter this sock by SPI of telling in the talk page of patrollers. Manoj Singh Gaur ( talk) 05:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Both the OP and the reported editor are blocked as socks. Note that the suspected master changed their username to Siddharaja ( talk · contribs), so maybe this should be moved to reflect that? Or it could just be closed and archived, not fussed either way.-- Ponyo ^{bons mots} 21:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply