DraculatheDragon ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

31 July 2018

Suspected sockpuppets

• Act345 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Two new accounts, used for same purpose of disruption, creating suspicion and claims to be editing wikipedia for years of years.

Both start their userpage by claiming they are not new editors.

• "Hi, i am Act345 (returning user)" [1] (Act345)
• "I am not a new editor" [2] (DraculatheDragon)

DraculatheDragon is a suspicious account that claims himself to be a sock of a "6 years" old account. [3] While Act345 claims he is "4 years" old account. [4]

• DraculatheDragon claims "I don't remember any password of any account." [5] (whole discussion: User talk:Boing! said Zebedee/Archive 31#Want to be unblocked)
• Act345 claims "can't remember anything (user & pass, edits ) to disclose from my old account". [6]

Both act like they are too touchy. "I don't have time for your impolite and bad-faith behaviour. You didn't even want me here despite me requesting.." [7] "why? if you can't support me to learn something useful for WP please don't discourage me at least." [8]

I see no difference.

Act345, like DraculatheDragon, has been hounding my contributions as he nominated a very notable article I created to AFD[ [9]] and left a COI template on my talk page, [10] and moved my article to draft space. [11] That's really too much for an account registered only 11 days ago.

While DraculatheDragon who retired his account, [12] has today reactivated his account after over 75 days to vote-stack on a discussion [13] where I have participated enough. [14] Accesscrawl ( talk) 12:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• All of this is highly circumstantial. Particularly given that there's no direct overlap in their editing, I see no evidence of sockpuppetry here. Closing without action. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 23:38, 31 July 2018 (UTC) reply