From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Davenbelle

Davenbelle ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

16 May 2010
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by   — Jeff G. ツ

This edit   — Jeff G. ツ 21:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply

See also Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Moby Dick#Findings of fact.   — Jeff G. ツ 21
37, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

true enough, and there are moar ;)

Sincerely, Street-Legal Sockpuppet Jack Merridew this user is a sock puppet 21:37, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users
  • Close this posthaste, please. This is old news and not actionable. ÷ seresin 21:39, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Davenbelle is an former sockpuppeteer. He is now using the username 'Jack Merridew'. He has been unblocked per the direction of the Arbitration Committee. User:Jack Merridew/History explains more. NW ( Talk) 21:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC) reply

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

4 April 2016
Suspected sockpuppets


Auto-generated every hour.

Similar name to one of the socks. Posted a barnstar here at User talk:Br'er Rabbit, a Davenbelle sock. Please see this suspected sock's talk page where he says he's not a sock, but rather an old friend. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 04:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Evidence for Jumbo willy per this. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 04:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

There is absolutely no way that either of those two accounts bear any sort of behavioural relationship to the editing of Davenbelle, Jack Merridew, etc. Nobody looking at Jumbo willy's immature contribution history could possibly confuse that with Jack's editing. Somebody's muddying the waters, but it's very unlikely to be Jack. -- RexxS ( talk) 21:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments