Voice your opinion ( talk page) (13/0/1); Scheduled to end 17:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
OverlordQ ( talk · contribs) - While I've had some qualms with this new policy when it was first proposed, after reconsideration I feel that having a wider community input will be better in the long-run as the BAG acts in an 'expert witness' role to the 'crats who give bots their flag. Current a member under the 'old system.' Q T C 17:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as a member of the Bot Approval Group. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Do you believe that the BAG inherently shares responsibility to the community for the bots and bot operators that approve? Should they rescind their approval if they see significant problems developing in the way a bot operators, or the way that a bot operator manages problem reports? John Vandenberg ( chat) 10:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Please keep discussion constructive and civil.