From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< November 3
November 5 >

November 4

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 4, 2023.

Wikicide

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa ( talk) 21:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. As far as I can tell, this word was not in the target page even around the time of creation in 2015. Search results find no contemporary uses, but it seems that this was jargon that was relatively common until circa 2008, but has only been used sporadically since ( this edit by Huldra in March 2021 is the latest use I've spotted) and from context "committing wikicide" seems to have meant "doing something that was (almost) guaranteed to result in you being blocked" (c.f. Wikipedia:Suicide by admin). The deletion log of m:Wikicide gives the content of that page as of 2005 as the slightly different "Any intentional act that damages the integrity of a Wiki page." ( m:Growing Wikimedia suggests there was nothing more to that page). For those interested in ancient history, there was apparently some content at this title that was deleted in 2003, the history of the discussion is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikicide (which appears to be the oldest surviving deletion discussion!) - I've not found the content, but it was described as a dictionary definition of jargon (maybe Tim Starling knows where to find it?). Thryduulf ( talk) 23:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply
    • From the meta deletion archive, the content when I moved it in 2003 was "Wikicide is the malicious destruction of wikipedia pages in pursuit of imposing some sort of absolute frame of reference one-sidedly seen as "neutral" point of view." This text was also quoted by Eloquence in his comment dated 04:47 30 Jun 2003. -- Tim Starling ( talk) 00:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, not relevant in article space. Jay 💬 12:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Charity work

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Charity (practice). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Charity (practice) seems like a better target. ‑‑ Neveselbert ( talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Retarget per nom. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 14:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Local path connectedness

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Locally connected space#locally path connected. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

These should point at the same article. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 19:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Green Gully Reserve

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 12#Green Gully Reserve

Template:R from native name

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 12#Template:R from native name

Charlize Rule (footballer)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. WP:IAR/ WP:SNOW close. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 16:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Currently unnecessary redirect since only one person with that name has an article (and as the nationality is Australian, per naming conventions for sports people, this page title would not be correct upon varieties of English). Iggy ( Swan) ( Contribs) 13:07, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Volufiline

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 13#Volufiline

Euruic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to York#Toponymy. ✗ plicit 14:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Unclear relation with target. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Kick in the butt

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗ plicit 12:11, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Is this really a necessary redirect? I have my doubts. Styx ( talk) 09:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

(month) 0

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Other than January 0 and March 0, there aren't alternative "(next month) 0" names for the last day of the prior month. 1033Forest ( talk) 23:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete since they have no mention where I expect there to be one, at List of non-standard dates. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 13:02, 29 October 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Weak retarget to List of non-standard dates#March 0, otherwise delete. In Excel-type spreadsheet date formulas, entering a date that is the 0th date of the month is equal to the last day of the preceding month; for example =DATE(YEAR(2023),MONTH(11),DAY(0)) returns the value representing October 31, 2023. The proposed target section comes closest to explaining this and could be expanded. January 0 seems to be the only one of these that has other unique uses. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 14:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 00:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete; rather unlikely and not particularly helpful for lack of an actual explanation anywhere. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 19:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as both unhelpful and unlikely.  —  SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per above -- Lenticel ( talk) 02:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC) reply
  • I have listed a previous RfD to this discussion. At the 2009 RfD, July 0 was retargeted to January 0. It is unclear why Steel1943 overwrote it with June 30, five years later. Jay 💬 06:01, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply
    @ Jay: Though the edit I performed presumably occurred almost 9 years ago, and I do not recall making it ... the rest of this discussion and the other redirects' targets (prior to their deletion) does not make it clear why I probably made the edit? Steel1943 ( talk) 15:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_4&oldid=1184887683"