From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 8

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 8, 2023.

National film registry"

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 09:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The only reason this redirect was created was because the NFR website used to host an erroneous external link to Wikipedia very long ago (click on "Wikipedia entries for each Registry film and year of induction"). However, the title would actually be National Film Registry", with different capitalization. And in any case, the current page no longer links to Wikipedia, so this redirect can be safely deleted. Also per WP:UNNATURAL. Dsuke1998AEOS ( talk) 19:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox book redirect

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC) reply

All 4 of these are remnants from a decade ago. They are unused and pointless. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 22:45, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 17:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clyde! Franklin! 17:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete all. These aren't used or even linked to. They offer no short or easier typing convention nor are they plausible redirects someone would actually use. So they are just more clutter with no real value. Gonnym ( talk) 07:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Delete all Unused, obsolete template redirects. – LaundryPizza03 ( d ) 09:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Commodity operating systems

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The word "commodity" is not mentioned in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is supposed to represent or identify. Also, the singular version of this redirect, Commodity operating system, does not exist and has never existed. In addition, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commodity operating systems, a discussion which occurred in 2005 that resulted in this title becoming a redirect. Steel1943 ( talk) 16:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Searching off-site, the plural and singular bring up a number of results including academic literature, some of which are referenced in a number of Wikipedia articles. On-site, the plural is used on Software-defined mobile network and EROS (microkernel), however neither of these explains the term. The singular is used on RTLinux and Virgil D. Gligor, and neither of these explains the term either.
Weak delete, until relevant content is added somewhere. There should be no prejudice against creating it again if content has been added. – Scyrme ( talk) 17:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 17:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clyde! Franklin! 17:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Great Privy Seal

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 22#Great Privy Seal

Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The topic of the redirect name and the topic of the target are not the same place. They are at different addresses, have separate histories and were (eventually) run by different organizations. (See context at Muslim_Mosque,_Inc.) I don't think there is an extant article for the correct topic, so perhaps the best option is to delete and let references be redlinks. Alternately, link it back to Muslim_Mosque,_Inc.. There are only three WLHs to the redirect (and one is the aforementioned article). The redirect was tagged for speedy in 2014, but the tag was removed by an admin; I believe that was in error (or on a technicality). Keith D. Tyler 04:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – dudhhr  talk  contribs (he/they) 16:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Apostolic Church (1911 denomination)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 16#Apostolic Church (1911 denomination)

DWKX-FM

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC) reply

False callsign, a page move from DWRR-FM that is likely vandalism. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 09:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Singulairty of an algebraic variety

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Unlikely typo; Singulairty does not exist either. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 09:09, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Invisible Child : Poverty, Survival & Hope in an American City

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 09:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Implausible search term (space between colons) Anarchyte ( talk) 06:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redirects to Paramount Television Studios

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Paramount Television. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Bundle with the other Paramount Television-related redirects at the one discussion. From Bassie f ( his talk page) 05:02, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

 Done. Bundled. Bassie f But what exactly are you proposing? To delete or to retarget somewhere? CycloneYoris talk! 07:44, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Yesterday my proposal was to retarget Closet Killer back to Paramount Television, so I am putting the same proposal into these redirects. Thanks @ CycloneYoris for bundling. From Bassie f ( his talk page) 08:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tay Tay

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Taytay per general consensus. (non-admin closure) 141 Pr { contribs/ Best page} 19:39, 13 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete as a not particularly common nickname not mentioned at target. An anonymous username, not my real name 03:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as it is likely better to redirect to the general /info/en/?search=Taytay page, which includes Taylor Swift anyway.
LegalSmeagolian ( talk) 04:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Retarget per above. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 16:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).