From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 12
September 14 >

September 13

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 13, 2022.

Barney the DInosaur

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#Barney the DInosaur

Cowboys

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 02:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Cowboys should redirect to Cowboy per WP:PLURALPT. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 16:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep: There's enough specific matches on that page for Cowboys that I feel this part of WP:PLURALPT applies the intentional use of a plural form by a reader or editor can be evidence that a separate primary topic exists at the plural form. Tartar Torte 17:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 18:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep per TartarTorte and WP:PLURALPT. Users using the plural are more likely to be seeking one of the entries at the dab than the cowboy article. Mdewman6 ( talk) 20:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Searching Google from Australia this term seems to have much greater affinity with the North Queensland Cowboys and the Dallas Cowboys than with Cowboy so linking to the disambiguation page seems appropriate. A7V2 ( talk) 05:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

White noise (slang)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to White noise#Informal use. Jay 💬 02:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

There doesn’t seem to be any meaningful use of the subtopic “slang” in the redirected article; I don’t see this as a plausible redirect. If nothing else it’s confusing and uninformative to the average reader. Dronebogus ( talk) 11:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Comment: There was an AfD for this that was closed as merge but then in the merging process was made into a redirect instead. Either the merge should be completed as a merge or this should be deleted. Tartar Torte 12:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. It is a {{ r from merge}} ( link to AfD), and therefore should be kept for history attribution purposes. The current article contains a sentence taken from the pre-redirect version (the text of ref #6 which includes the quote "The political rhetoric on Social Security is white noise.")
I would note that the AfD nominator ( Zxcvbnm) proceeded to turn the page into a redirect with an "unnecessary disambiguation" tag and an edit summary that no merge was required six minutes after the AfD closure. I am aware that AfD closes as "merge" are hard to implement if the closer did not give clear instructions, but still, I think it was a bit high-handed. Tigraan Click here for my talk page ("private" contact) 15:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 18:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Userwork

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#Template:Userwork

Amit Goswami

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#Amit Goswami

Vibrating plane

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Glossary of spirituality terms#Plane where it is mentioned. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 17:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Reality shift

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#Reality shift

Untitled The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Redirect is not useful because game has a name already Ebbedlila ( talk) 16:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - The game has been in development for like 3-4 years, and was given its final name 2 hours ago. There's going to be people who don't know the new title yet. The redirect will still be useful to people not glued to the video game news cycle. Sergecross73 msg me 16:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Wait a few months for the name to be better-known first. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 04:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Sergecross73. Many people will be coming to this article to find out whether it has a final name yet, we should not require they already know the answer before they can find the answer. For future reference though, the word "Untitled" should never have been part of this article title to begin with "The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild sequel" or "nth The Legend of Zelda series video game" would have been equally correct both before and after naming. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Extant

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Unused shortcut; created with the comment "Template:Extant organization" is an existing redirect to {{COI editnotice}}. "Extant" is applied to many other nouns as well, so this just seems confusing. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 10#Template:Ext (ping User:Thryduulf). 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep. My comment in the linked discussion applies here too - in the absence of any evidence this is actually causing any problems (not just that it theoretically might cause problems) there is no reason to delete and no benefits will arise from doing so. I'm weak here because it is unused and so unlike with template:Ext deletion is unlikely to actually cause any harm. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: As it doesn't seem to be transcluded anywhere and the naming is not particularly easy to follow, it seems like deletion wouldn't do much harm Tartar Torte 02:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Masters of Teraes Kaesi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 14:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Eubot diacritic redirect that's a pretty obvious misfire. The inspiration for this name was Finnish, not German, so the umlaut-e rule doesn't apply. It's unused, gets essentially no page views, and absolutely no sources ever use this spelling, so it's actively misleading to have this here. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 13:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Heroscape

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 13:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

I may add other examples here in a moment, but there are a series of redirects to Heroscape that are not notable in the slightest (e.g. there may be one figure in the entire game of that species of faction). As such, they are not listed at the target page. Requesting delete. TNstingray ( talk) 12:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Comment. These were originally submitted separately, but I have condensed them under one heading. There are actually a lot of redirects to the Heroscape, seemingly made by an over-zealous fan back in the day (link here [1] for your convenience). I feel like most of these can actually be deleted (besides the alternate spellings for the game and maybe the Kyrie generals), though I listed the most obvious examples. Is there any way to access page view data to find out for certain if these are even in use? TNstingray ( talk) 13:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
@ TNstingray to see the page view data for these redirects click the "stats" link next to it above. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all. a) they are not mentioned at the target and as such provide no use to a Heroscape fan who wants to read about these guys; and b) quite a few of these include unneeded DABs - ex. there is no Moltarns page so Moltarns (Heroscape) is just taking up extra real estate. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 14:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    There are about two dozen more that fall into that category, and I'm fairly certain that all of them trace back to one over-zealous editor who made these separate non-notable lore pages before they were all turned into redirects. The editor in question is not longer active. Even in the game itself, the character lore is really not important or expanded upon at all other than the seven Archkyrie Generals. As such, some of the remaining links may only be referring to vague lists of factions in each army, if that makes sense. Should I go ahead and list these redirects here, or should I start another section (since these technically are mentioned at the target, albeit in passing mention rather that actual information for a prospective fan)? TNstingray ( talk) 20:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all per TNstingray. They aren't mentioned at the target and they are unlikely search terms. Jontesta ( talk) 00:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tolyltriazole

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#Tolyltriazole

Diffabled

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 02:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Somewhat offensive slang word for disabled, from "differently abled", Not mentioned in target. We could possibly consider this a misspelling of disabled, but that is a stretch. This is a newspaper that actually used it in a headline. MB 02:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Comment. There is no Wiktionary entry at wikt:diffabled but there is at wikt:diffability which does not mention offensiveness. From a few minutes on google and twitter, it seems that the intention of both coinages was positive and "diffability" is generally not regarded as being offensive. Opinions regarding "diffabled", even among those to whom it applies, range from being very positive to very negative - some find it offensive others find it empowering. Thryduulf ( talk) 09:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - I do not see evidence that it is in wide use, but 'differently abled' redirects to disability, and if we agree that diffabled refers to 'differently abled', then I see no problem with keeping the redirects, especially if there is no agreement in sources that the term is offensive. In fact, 'differently abled' is typically a more acceptable way of saying 'disabled'.
‡ El cid, el campeador talk 13:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per most of El cid's comment (whether "differently abled" is more acceptable than "disabled" is something else that the people to whom it applies disagree about) and my earlier comment. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Литва́

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Litva. Jay 💬 02:37, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

This is Lithuania in Bulgarian. Wikipedia is not a language translation dictionary. MB 01:43, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Retarget. First choice to Litva (a dab page) which notes it is the name for Lithuania in multiple Slavic languages including Russian (with which there is an affinity) and the native Russian name for Litva, Kursk Oblast. There is also Litva, Brest Voblast in Belarus which is a country that also has a strong affinity with Russian. Second choice is targetting Litva, Kursk Oblast directly (it already has a hatnote to the disambig). Thryduulf ( talk) 08:47, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Added Литва (by the same creator) to the nomination, since that is the regular spelling of the term as used outside of dictionaries or other linguistic works where highlighting the pronunciation/stress is necessary. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:51, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    Confirming my recommendation above applies to both redirects. Thryduulf ( talk) 19:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:17, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Retarget to Litva, per Thryduulf and because it's explicitly mentioned there. Usually the best practice for foreign names of countries is to point them to the relevant "names of X" article (e.g. 德國 → Names of Germany, Китай → Names of China, ベトナム → Names of Vietnam), but in this case the same term has other meanings as well. 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 20:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment "Литва" seems to be the page for Lithuania on the Bulgarian, Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedias, with the similar "Літва" for Belarussian. All of them except Bulgarian Wikipedia also have a disambiguation page for other terms. Per Thryduulf and IP I think the disambig would be a good target, since the term is explicitly mentioned there in Cyrillic. – DirkJandeGeer щи 08:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Morbius (Film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. It may be the case that it was not worth the effort to bring this to RfD, but delete !voting editors have a substantial numeric majority, and I don't see a compelling reason to close in favor of a different outcome given that either side had arguments of roughly equal strength policy-wise. signed, Rosguill talk 16:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Per longstanding consensus against miscapitalized disambiguators. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 01:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep as completely harmless and potentially helpful. Deletion offers absolutely no benefits. Thryduulf ( talk) 01:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Thryduulf. Someone might hold the ⇧ Shift key for too long, plus it's unambiguous and can help readers get to their intended article. Regards, SONIC 678 05:16, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as harmless. Glades12 ( talk) 15:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - if you type in "Morbius" to the search bar, both of them pop up - which one should be clicked first? Just seems a bit annoying. originalmess talk 08:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    A very minor annoyance for some of a subset of readers (only those who use the internal search engine will see this, and not all of them will find it annoying) is not a reason to delete a redirect that helps other readers. Thryduulf ( talk) 11:15, 9 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    This only helps the small minority of readers who a) search directly from the search bar, b) search using disambiguators, and c) don't know that we lowercase disambiguators. Meanwhile, for people trying to link to the film from the VisualEditor, both come up, a significantly greater concern. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 00:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    Given that a reader following either link will arrive at the same article you're going to need to explain why it is concerning at all, let alone a greater concern than some readers failing to find what they want. Also, those arriving via the search bar are not the only ones who will benefit from this - e.g. anyone following a link also will. Thryduulf ( talk) 08:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Comment While this could marginally help users I feel like going against longstanding consensus, which with I agree, could open up pandora's box to have many of these created. Tartar Torte 00:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply
I have struck my delete !vote as this seems to be wikilawyering on my part upon reflection. I think my statement better serves as a comment than a !vote. Tartar Torte 00:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete It seems that searching for other film articles (e.g. 1920 (film)) in the internal search engine but intentionally capitalising the "f" in "film" sends you to the correct page, without a redirect. It doesn't do much harm, but it isn't needed as a redirect, and as Tamzin mentioned it could be confusing if you're linking to the film in visual editor/Updated source editor. Deleting it will make sure people use the correctly capitalised link – DirkJandeGeer щи 09:52, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    Other {{ R from other capitalisation}} redirects exist without confusing people in the visual editor why would this be? Why should we force everybody to use the "correct" link when either will get everybody to the exact same place? What benefits will accrue from that? Thryduulf ( talk) 12:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Personally, I feel that all redirects brought to RfD that serve no purpose, i.e., should not have been created, should be deleted as a way of general cleanup, even if they are harmless. However, that is not within the principles of Rfd as a reason to delete. Incorrect capitalization in parenthetical disambiguation has even been specifically carved out from WP:RDAB. All that said, the nom is correct that such redirects have certainly been deleted at Rfd in the past. Such things should not depend on whoever shows up to Rfd at the time, we should strive to be consistent. Mdewman6 ( talk) 20:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Merely redundant clutter for prospective readers and editors. TNstingray ( talk) 23:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 13:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: classic WP:RDAB. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment I note that despite multiple assertions that this is harmful, nobody has yet articulated how or why this is harmful in any way that is consistent with other redirects from other/incorrect capitalisations not being. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as a recently created unnecessary redirect. This was created less than a month back when the properly cased disambiguator existed. The harm is not in this specific redirect, but to the project, if we continue encouraging such redirects. It is a waste of the editor's time and discussion time for all, as such nominations are driven by past precedent and not guideline. The redirect creator may have created 200 or 300 capitalization-related redirects (I just browsed through the contributions) in the last month alone, and continues to create them even though he was informed about the futility of this kind of work. Jay 💬 02:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    What harm to the project? If the individual redirects are not harmful, then how can they be collectively harmful? Deletion discussions are not, and have never been, based on precedent they are based on the characteristics of the page being nominated so that's a red herring. The activity that wastes editor's time is nominating harmless redirects for discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Transit system (name of specific service)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Apologies for all of the batch nominations today. These all have the format of some public transit system followed by a parenthetical with one of its services, pointing to the page for the specific service. These redirects are useless because (for the most part) their titles already contain the full name of the target article, and the parentheticals are misleading (it leads to e.g. the Trenton Line of SEPTA, not the SEPTA of Trenton Line). Delete. eviolite (talk) 04:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all: These are not how we use disambiguators. It's just a huge set of reverse disambiguators, which make them all prima facie implausble. Tartar Torte 13:36, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all More useless jailbroken iPod redirects. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 21:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Purple Line (MBTA [name] Line)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:14, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

These lines are never referred to as the Purple Line for obvious reasons (they're all purple), and the redirects' titles contain the full name anyway, so they're useless. Delete. eviolite (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all All commuter rail on the MBTA is signed as purple, but these lines are not called the purple line, as they're all different lines. It's one of those scenarios where the entire name of the target article is included within the disambiguator and a distinct lack of common references for these being called the "purple line", show to me deletion will not cause much harm. Tartar Torte 12:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
    Ok upon further research, I did find this one tweet that makes me think that it might be possible called the purple line in that the MBTA Commuter Rail division sent out. Where they do use the term Purple Line, but if you follow the thread there is some context there where they're replying to a tweet where the MBTA names that line the purple line in parentheses showing it's not a common name. I still support deletion, but I'd be remiss if I didn't remark that I found this one counterexample, albeit not a strong one. Tartar Torte 12:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
MBTA Commuter Rail Twitter
@MBTA_CR

Replying to @MBTA

Purple line - best line... Though we're a little biased, ourselves. ^ME

25 March 2020 [1]

  • Delete all All redirects created by this user (the indeffed jailbroken iPod) should be deleted, in my opinion. So many are pointless or cause confusion, as these do. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 21:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
I was thinking of something along that line, but there are some useful redirects created by said user. Maybe a compromise would be to have a way to CSD them instead of having to go through the full RfD process? That's a pretty specific CSD category proposal though. Tartar Torte 13:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ MBTA Commuter Rail [@MBTA_CR] (March 25, 2020). "Purple line - best line... Though we're a little biased, ourselves. ^ME" ( Tweet) – via Twitter.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

NYC Subway color lines

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:11, 20 September 2022 (UTC) reply

The New York City Subway services are not referred to by color (due to ambiguity); the physical lines (tracks) certainly don't either (and they can be even more ambiguous: for example, you can see there are services with four different colors on the Queens Boulevard Line), and the disambiguation/parenthetical formatting does not make much sense. Delete as unnecessary. eviolite (talk) 03:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all: For these redirects to help, one would have to know the color of the letter/number badge for the line, if the line was IND or BMT for a fair number of these and what primary street the line tracks for a period of time, but somehow not the name of the line itself. The utility of this seems rather implausible as well as none of the lines, as mentioned by the nominator, are referred to by color. So all of this is not very likely to be used and seems to really require both an intricate knowledge of New York and how subway lines are referred to as the _ Line, but not a knowledge of the letter/number of the line itself that one is trying to find. It all seems rather implausible to me. Tartar Torte 12:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete all More jailbroken iPod nonsense. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 21:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2026 Formula One World Championship

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#2026 Formula One World Championship

Elizabeth II (Cars)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 20#Elizabeth II (Cars)

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_13&oldid=1111394113"