The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 05:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• S42: In case of fire use ... (indicate in the space the precise type of fire-fighting equipment. If water increases the risk add - Never use water) → List of S-phrases  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This appears to be erroneous, as S43 is about in case of fire, while S42 is about fumigation. Hog Farm _Talk 23:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. We already have the correct redirects for both S-phrases, so why do we still need this? Regards, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 00:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete: This redirect contains a falsehood that makes it unlikely to be searched for. Furthermore, it is very unwieldy. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 17:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete: per above Qwerfjkl talk 07:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 00:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 05:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Harpies in popular culture → Harpy#Harpies in popular culture  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

"In popular culture" pages were all the rage, until most of them were swept away. This one was created after an AFD discussion, but Harpy no longer has the "in popular culture" section where this once redirected to. Geschichte ( talk) 20:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete: This redirect's target section was deleted. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 17:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 05:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Narmeen Choudhury → WPIX  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. Geschichte ( talk) 20:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete: The relationship between this redirect and its target is unclear. ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 17:58, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Justification. This redirect existing is unhelpful but deleting it gives unhelpful search results, so whatever. —  J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:11, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 05:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Bird app → Twitter  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to be an alternative name for the target. Delete, as it could cause confusion for readers looking for an actual app about birds. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:59, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Anecdotally I've heard this name used, and https://www.google.com/search?q=%22bird+app%22+twitter does show some examples. That said, there's also the existence of Bird (transportation company) to consider. Their core business runs through an app. At this point, keeping, deleting, dabbing, and retargeting with a hatnote all seem to have their merits. -- Tamzin ^{cetacean needed} (she/they) 20:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete - vague, and not sufficient pageviews to suggest utility. I've seen Twitter referred to as "birdsite" a whole lot, but never "bird app". Ivanvector's squirrel ( ^trees/ _nuts) 20:10, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 05:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Bird site → Twitter  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

"Bird site" seems ambiguous, so I think this should be either disambiguated or deleted. Qwerfjkl talk 19:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep per my comment in the discussion above, absent any other suggested uses. Ivanvector's squirrel ( ^trees/ _nuts) 20:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Doing a google search for this seems to turn up results primarily related to bird sanctuaries. 192.76.8.74 ( talk) 01:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete as vague. Bird site could refer to birdwatching sites and sanctuaries according to my google search. -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete I created this redirect page (as with bird app) because I thought, given their not too uncommon uses as euphemisms for twitter, it would be useful and justified. But in hindsight, their uses are not common enough for it to be unlikely that they would be confused with either the transportation company or with bird sanctuaries respectively. I support deletion on this basis. Farleigheditor ( talk) 17:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget Sb element to Antimony, and Sc element to Scandium. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Sb element → Ozarkodinida  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Sc element → Ozarkodinida  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Either delete or create a disambiguation page. "Sb element" appears to be just a minor property of Ozarkodinida, not substational enough to be the redirect target in my opinion, whereas people searching for Sb element are also quite likely to look for Antimony. Pieceofmetalwork ( talk) 16:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Antimony (chemical symbol Sb). The current target does not explain at all what an "Sb element" is, just that it's a property of the organism; readers will not find any particularly useful information there. Ivanvector's squirrel ( ^trees/ _nuts) 20:13, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Antimony per Ivanvector, this target would WP:ASTONISH certain readers. Also, I think it's worth discussing Sc element, which is also listed as a property of the order, and could redirect to its element ( Scandium) to avoid a similar problem. Regards, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 00:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget Sb element to Antimony and SC element to Scandium as most plausible targets. -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget both per above; per WP:ASTONISH. Hog Farm _Talk 03:03, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget Sb element to Antimony and Sc element to Scandium per WP:R#ASTONISH. Mdewman6 ( talk) 18:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) scope_creep ^Talk 19:03, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Myxofibrosarcoma → Histiocytoma  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

The World Heath Organisation has reclassified myxofibrosarcoma as a distinct entity, not in any way a form of the histiocytomas. Editor User:Joflaher is creating a new page on Myxofibrosarcoma, in his sandbox as we speak. scope_creep ^Talk 15:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

So the redirect needs to go. scope_creep ^Talk 16:23, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Keep - until the draft is ready for mainspace, this is a useful {{ R from related subject}} redirect. The draft could have been moved over this redirect when it's ready had it not been nominated for discussion, but you'll have to get an admin or pagemover to do it for you now (if nobody else does, ping me and I will). Joflaher's sandbox is currently blank, and has been for two weeks. Ivanvector's squirrel ( ^trees/ _nuts) 20:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  Just as a note, it's not necessary to RfD redirects if a drafted article should be moved to that title. Once the new article is ready, just tag the redirect with {{ db-move}} (see link for instructions) and someone with the required userrights will do it for you. Ivanvector's squirrel ( ^trees/ _nuts) 20:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  The redirect is false. The World Health Organisation has reclassified it. New research I assume. Joflaher is writing the article off wiki. I will ping you when its ready. scope_creep ^Talk 21:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  The conversation is on my talk page. Joflaher he will be ready in a couple of days. I was hoping to get rid of the redirect and have a nice clean revision history but it is six and half a dozen. I guess this can be closed now scope_creep ^Talk

  If it's being drafted off-wiki that complicates things. Are you planning to paste the off-wiki content over the redirect? As for being "false", the current target explains that myxofibrosarcomas were classified as histiocytomas until recently, and until we have better information on myxofibrosarcomas that's useful information for readers. Ivanvector's squirrel ( ^trees/ _nuts) 14:16, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  Wanting a "nice clean revision history" isn't a valid reason to delete something.

  IMO this nomination was unnecessary. All that is necessary is to boldly follow the directions at Wikipedia:Redirect#How to edit a redirect or convert it into an article, if/when an article on the specific subject gets written. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 05:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  I will keep it in mind for the future. I'm just going to close this, a non-admin closure as the draft is now ready. scope_creep ^Talk 19:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. deleted per WP:CSD G6 (non-admin closure) AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 17:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Wikipedia:Sam Reklaw → Sam Reklaw  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Unnecessary redirect from Wikipedia space to articlespace GoingBatty ( talk) 14:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdraw. Passing mention is enough, withdrawing as I was not aware of this. (non-admin closure) Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor ( talk) ( Stupidity by me) 15:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Hedgehog Engine → Sonic Unleashed#Development  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Possible delete. Redirect only has a passing mention of the subject, stating that it was simply used (and developed) for the Sonic Unleashed. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor ( talk) ( Stupidity by me) 13:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Keep - a passing mention is sufficient for a redirect. Sergecross73 msg me 14:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Religious fanaticism. ✗ plicit 02:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Ultra-religious → Extremism  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

I'm not sure this is really an appropriate redirect. My first thought was that this would be a good search term for an article on religious observance, but Religious observance just points to Religious law, which is also a poor fit for this search term. I'm leaning towards deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 13:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Religious fanaticism, which I think is what is meant by the redirect (and where Religious extremism points). It's better to redirect to a more specific term than to misguide people to the wrong general page. Regards, SONIC ⁶⁷⁸ 14:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to religious fanaticism per Sonic678. Ivanvector's squirrel ( ^trees/ _nuts) 15:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Keep Extremism does contain the words religion and religious, fanaticism, fundamentalism, and nearly every other descriptors associated with the ultra-religious are found in it. Stereotyping all religious observance as Wikt:ultra- religious is WP:POV. For eg, describing all religious observances of Judaism including those of progressive Judaism, as ultra-orthodox Judaism, is unlikely to find support in scholarly works and expert led researches. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolicmahr ( talk • contribs) 17:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply

  I was actually going to bring up ultra-orthodox Jews to make an opposed argument: while definitely ultra-religious, most do not fit the description of "extremist" described at Extremism. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:06, 2 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Comment Ultranationalist politics and ultra-religious (fanatics) are often found in close proximity and will even interlap, eg the Sunni extremist group of Taliban and ISIS Khorasan etc in Afghanistan. This is another reason to keep the target the same as it is, Extremism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolicmahr ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to religious fanaticism as a more specifically relevant target. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 10:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to religious fanaticism - seems plausible as not all ultra-religious activities are extremisms. 2409:4061:2DCF:43B5:E317:7091:533B:2FF1 ( talk) 05:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.