The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 01:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Strage degli Innocenti → Massacre of the Innocents  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This appears to fall afoul of WP:RLOTE, as there is no mention of the Italian name at the target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Disambiguate (drafted) for the various WP:DABMENTIONed Italian works. The current target can go in WP:DABSEEALSO. 61.239.39.90 ( talk) 14:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Disambiguate per IP. Narky Blert ( talk) 10:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 21:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Revolving drum → Pellet drum  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

I haven't been able to find any indication that a pellet drum is ever known as a revolving drum. None of the other articles that use the phrase is a viable target. –  Arms & Hearts ( talk) 21:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• comment this was probably intended to ultimately redirect to tumble finishing, though I don't know that I would choose that target myself. Mangoe ( talk) 02:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC) reply
• Comment I've seen trommels referred to as revolving drums and rotating drums -- 67.70.26.89 ( talk) 04:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete - only references I can find for "revolving drum" are crossword clues websites, with answers including barrel, machines such as a loom, or a wide variety of musical instruments. If it's a notable topic I can't tell what it is, but a redlink would encourage article creation. Side note, the creator's block log is the first time I've seen "general feeling of malaise" as a block rationale. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 18:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete could also be parts of a Concrete mixers.-- 65.92.160.124 ( talk) 21:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Vitol'd Karlovic Tseraskiy → Meanings of minor planet names: 1–1000#807  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Minimal mention of Tseraskiy on the target page. Additionally, Tseraskiy is the topic of a requested article. Vaporwaveboyfriend ( talk) 21:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Strong Keep, has useful information on the person. There is currently no page on the person, so it is useful. Maybe if a page was created then the redirect should be deleted. For now there is no reason to delete this very important redirect. Sahaib3005 ( talk) 08:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep - minimal mention is content. The entire purpose of redirects is to get readers to content relevant to the title, however minimal it may be. Ivanvector ( ^Talk/ _Edits) 18:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Cold War (1985–1991). I agree with the retarget suggestion and it has been endorsed by the editor who created the redirect. No need to leave this open. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Reagan & Gorbachev → Kenneth Adelman  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Adelman was an advisor to Reagan for his summits with Gorbachev, but there's minimal content about that at this target. If we had an article summarizing the Geneva Summit (1985), Reykjavík Summit, Washington Summit (1987), Moscow Summit (1988), and Governors Island Summit, that would be the ideal target for this phrase, but lacking such a target I'm not sure that we have an alternative to deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Cold War (1985–1991), which covers the period of Gorbachev and Regan's involvement in the Cold war. 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 20:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Cold War (1985–1991) per above. Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 23:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Beijingese. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Beijingnese → Beijing  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Delete, implausible misspelling of Beijingese. -- Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 12:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep There are search results where people use "Beijingnese" so I argue it is plausible

  Example: " MODEL MANAGEMENT IN VIRTUAL REALITY RESEARCH" Page 3: "[...]we can place her in the ‘Beijingnese’ sort, or[...]"

  WhisperToMe ( talk) 14:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• ( edit conflict) Retarget to the disambiguation page I've just created at Beijingese. Google results make it very clear that this is not an implausible spelling at all, see as some examples these books [1], [2], [3], [4]. Indeed I'd go so far as to say this is an alternative spelling rather than a misspelling. Thryduulf ( talk) 14:58, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Beijingese per Thryduulf. It is presumably analogous to Pekinese (which can be written as Pekingnese pronounced with an N - [5]), so it is neither implausible nor a misspelling. Hzh ( talk) 16:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Names of Beijing#Historical names of Beijing. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Northern Peace → Beijing  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Retarget to Names of Beijing as a literal translation of Beiping. -- Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 12:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget per nom to Names of Beijing#Historical names of Beijing. Though I wouldn't oppose deleting this since it comes across as slightly ambiguous. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Names of Beijing. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Peip'ing → Beijing  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Retarget to Names of Beijing as consistent with Beiping. -- Soumya-8974 (he) ^talk _contribs ^subpages 12:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Support As it is a technical Wade-Giles form (Pei-p'ing) but not used often in English WhisperToMe ( talk) 14:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
• Support per above, wherever Beiping is pointing this should also, as it's just a valid but uncommon romanisation of the same name. ~ mazca ^talk 20:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikimedia Foundation#Infrastructure and coordination projects. -- BDD ( talk) 22:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Wikimedia Incubator → Meta:Wikimedia Incubator  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 1#Template:Wikimedia Meta-Wiki redirect held that redirects to meta within the mainspace were not appropriate. If this redirect is deemed appropriate here in its current form, I will duly seek the restoration of that template. That aside and for clarity, the plain soft redirect template is not used in the mainspace (see also WP:SOFTSP). —  Godsy ^{( TALK} _CONT) 23:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Wikimedia Foundation#Infrastructure and coordination projects and tag as {{ R to list entry}}. Thryduulf ( talk) 01:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. No mention in target, participants are unanimous in agreeing that these are not useful redirects in their current state. I think there's a valid argument that the best service to a reader is providing the search results. If someone thinks there's enough useful targets to create a disambiguation page, it was not really discussed further here, and is left to editors' discretion. ~ mazca ^talk 18:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Spaceless → Cary Joji Fukunaga  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]
• Spaceless (film) → Cary Joji Fukunaga  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ]

Tenuous connection. Just the title of a script he was attached to direct a long time ago. Not one mention in the target article. Albeit apparently also the title of a song in an album that has an article, "spaceless" being an actual word, it benefits more the reader who typed it in the search box to let them see the search results than to send them to any one article. Nardog ( talk) 23:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Comment "Spaceless" should do something else, and not redirect to Fukunaga; probably be a disambiguation page, since there's a song "Spaceless" on Liebling (album), and another song by Boombox Cartel -- 67.70.26.89 ( talk) 04:37, 20 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete both per nom. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Compounds of lead#Halides and other salts. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 21:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• PbI4 → Lead(II) iodide  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Lead(IV) iodide is a different (seemingly nonexistent) compound not mentioned at the target. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 00:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Compounds of lead says The bromide and iodide of lead(IV) are not known to exist. Not a plausible search term. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 03:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Compounds of lead#Halides and other salts. The current target is clearly incorrect. Retargeting will serve to bring searchers to the relevant information. Mdewman6 ( talk) 21:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Compounds of lead#Halides and other salts per Mdewman6. It's not a compound that exists, but it's one that could be reasonably looked up based on the existence of other lead halides and has a sourced mention stating it doesn't exist. That entry is likely to answer the reader's enquiry. ~ mazca ^talk 16:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.