From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 24
June 26 >

June 25

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 25, 2018.

Rosfeld

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 02:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Misleading and useless redirect being that we already have a Michael Rosfeld redirect to the article and there are other individuals with that last name, who have no connections to the shooting. We do not have other last name redirects to other officer-involved shootings like Wilson to Michael Brown or Liang to Akai Gurley 69.118.35.133 ( talk) 21:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, I agree that a surname redirect is not helpful when the surname-holder is not the subject of the redirect target and is not notable enough to justify a standalone article. — Xezbeth ( talk) 07:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC) reply
    Delete, too general to exist. The editor whose username is Z0 09:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete {{ R from surname}} plus {{ R avoided double redirect}} is a bridge too far. Recreate as a {{ surname}} index if and when there's actually multiple people by this name discussed in Wikipedia. 59.149.124.29 ( talk) 13:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or create article - Keep, retarget, or create an article at this location. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 14:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Indeed there are other people called Rosfeld. Since this title redirects to a fatal incident, I would advise erring on the delete side to avoid WP:BLP concerns. Deryck C. 12:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Opinion polling for the next Slovenian parliamentary election

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The redirect made a bit of sense a few weeks ago but now that the election has passed, there's no valid target for "the next election". Pichpich ( talk) 18:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep and restore content @ Pichpich: The "next Slovenian election" now refers to the next election (this is, the one to be held after the 2018 election and in or before 2022). It looks like the page was already underway collecting opinion polling for the next election. But for some reason, it looks like you blanked the page, then turned it into a redirect yourself, then ask for it to be deleted (??). In my view, the blanked content should be restored. This discussion has little sense. Impru20 talk 18:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply
Nevermind. I got confused by the article's history. I retract the nomination. Pichpich ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Robert Nichols (Former Unidentified Person)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation of correctly capitalised redirect. Deryck C. 12:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply

This is a remnant from a no-consensus page move. I had already created Robert Nichols (identity thief) as a redirect, so this one is probably redundant. Home Lander ( talk) 17:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete or rename to "Robert Nichols (formerly unidentified person)" to fix the capitalization and grammar. Falling Gravity 23:30, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply
    Delete per spelling error. The editor whose username is Z0 09:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. I didn't know FUP was a title. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 16:20, 26 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anal Cujt

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 6#Anal Cujt

Strong Lebanon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete as unopposed. Deryck C. 12:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply

"Strong Lebanon" is, according to Members of the 2018–22 Lebanese Parliament a voting bloc/coalition of which the Free Patriotic Movement is the largest but not only member. I believe this redirect should be deleted if it is not first overwritten with an article about the bloc. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Acoptic polygon

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 6#Acoptic polygon

Heretic Astartes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete as unopposed. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Term not present in target article, nothing to tell the reader why they have reached this article. No evidence that this is a useful redirect. Pam D 09:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Olin-Sang-Ruby Union Institute

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 6#Olin-Sang-Ruby Union Institute

Coptic polyhedron

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:41, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Neither the article, nor Google, has anything about "Coptic polyhedron/a": perhaps this is a typo for "Acoptic polyhedron". Is it a plausible typo? I suggest it's more likely to confuse the reader. Pam D 09:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Here's one example: [1]. (It talks about coptic deltahedra, but a deltahedron is just a polyhedron with triangular faces.) If you look at Grunbaum's paper Acoptic polyhedra, the terms he uses are acoptic and nonacoptic, so "coptic" is non-standard, but it's easy to see how someone would encounter the term "acoptic" and think its negation is formed by removing the prefix. Though it's weakly attested, a mathematically-inclined reader might be more confused to look for polyhedra and only encounter topics related to Egypt. - Apocheir ( talk) 21:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Keep per the sort of reasoning by Apocheir. Seems like a reasonable redirect. JoshuaZ ( talk) 21:46, 29 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Middletown ct

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 12:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Lower case state abbrev plus no comma: we don't need redirects from every possibly mangled version of the name of every settlemen in the USA. Pam D 09:36, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per nom. Potentially confusing with "ct" meaning "court" like a street name. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 16:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - I agree. This doesn't seem particularly helpful. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 05:48, 27 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strong Republic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Thanks, IP, for the work. -- BDD ( talk) 14:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Initially created redirecting to Lebanese Forces where the term is not mentioned. Retargetted by @ Godsy: with comment "Slightly better", but still does not seem a useful redirect. Pam D 08:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lebanon First

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 14:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

No mention of this term in target article to show the reader why they have arrived there. No evidence that this is a useful redirect. Pam D 08:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Team Dambulla

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:45, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

"Team Dambulla" has several incoming links from other articles, so it is not appropriate to redirect readers to one particular tournament (in which page it has at least two "outgoing" circular links). Better to leave it as a red link until someone writes the article. Pam D 08:45, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Team Galle

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cricket in Sri Lanka#Domestic competitions. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

"Team Galle" has several incoming links from other articles, so it is not appropriate to redirect readers to one particular tournament (in which page it has at least two "outgoing" circular links). Better to leave it as a red link until someone writes the article. Pam D 08:45, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Team Kandy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was 'retarget to Cricket in Sri Lanka#Domestic competitions. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

"Team Kandy" has several incoming links from other articles, so it is not appropriate to redirect readers to one particular tournament (in which page it has at least two "outgoing" circular links). Better to leave it as a red link until someone writes the article. Pam D 08:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Team Colombo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Cricket in Sri Lanka#Domestic competitions. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC) reply

"Team Colombo" has severa incoming links from other articles, so it is not appropriate to redirect readers to one particular tournament (in which page it has at least two "outgoing" circular links). Better to leave it as a red link until someone writes the article. Pam D 08:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ephixa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no administrative action. The discussion has shown no need for deletion at this stage. @ Z0, Thryduulf, and Peter James: You are welcome to change the redirect target as you see fit, or move an article over the redirect when a viable one gets written. Deryck C. 12:59, 3 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Re-direct needs to be deleted if the draft reviewer wants to accept and move it into the mainspace. Micro ( Talk) 06:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. The draft has been declined many times by different reviewers. It can be G6-ed when someone wants to accept it. For now, I don't see why it should be deleted. The editor whose username is Z0 06:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per The editor. Redirects do not need to be deleted in advance of possible page moves, admins can delete them automatically when actually moving the page. Until then the redirect continues to perform a useful function. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply
  • There's no reason to delete until a draft is accepted by a reviewer, but until then it would be better redirected to Monstercat, which has some information, not Monstercat 001 – Launch Week, where the name is only in a track listing. Peter James ( talk) 21:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Muzzy (DJ)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 3#Muzzy (DJ)

LWIAY

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 3#LWIAY

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_25&oldid=1073158681"