The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
F9 by
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
F9 by
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
F9 by
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 10:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
Hi I dont understand, I own all the rights of the 70 shows. what do you need from me? you can visit my site @ www.elshowdelucky.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elshowdelucky ( talk • contribs) 03:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Magog the Ogre (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 15:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: File was not marked as available under a free license or public domain. --
Elvey (
talk) 18:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
reply
This statement in the rationale "The purpose of the document is to provide official, PUBLIC notice of the Accreditation." is incorrect. This image was taken from the website of Recipero Ltd. They posted it their in the mistaken belief that its purpose was indeed to act as a publicly shareable statement of the accreditation status. However, on April 15th 2013 the issuer of the certificate made it clear to Recipero that this was intended to be a confidential document and as such should be removed from the public domain. Recipero have immediately removed the original image from their website and I now request that it is removed from Wikipedia. (see file talk page) Alexf (talk) 13:23, 16 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete without prejudice against recreation under an appropriate license. ( ESkog)( Talk) 17:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
B (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 21:07, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as
F8 by
Magog the Ogre (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 06:04, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: Keep under correct licensing. ( ESkog)( Talk) 17:58, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Delete No evidence of free license. Danger High voltage! 15:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC) Danger High voltage! 15:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by
Magog the Ogre (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 15:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result of the discussion was: speedy deletion as copyvio (derivative work). This was only used on a user page draft so fair use criteria did not apply. De728631 ( talk) 15:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC) reply