This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it's good enough to be a featured list, and I'd like to get some feedback so that can happen soon. Thanks,
Malkinann (
talk) 05:48, 6 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The summaries are imprecise and need a lot of work -- see the Talk page for some examples. I can't do that since I have no idea what the author is driving at in a number of places. I also think there's too much detail, but that may be a matter of taste. It's a good first start, but it needs a lot of work.
Timothy Perper (
talk) 11:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I'll go and work on fixing the summaries, especially in reducing since they give too much plot IMO. I'm too busy attending finals right now, so this'll be done maybe next year. Same goes with the links provided by Extremepro. I remember the gpara and allcinema links are reliable are third-party; I remember someone telling me to use the latter and the former is a news site. For the livedoor blog and the moonphase one, I probably will have them removed.
Ominae (
talk) 02:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC)reply