The result of the debate was to delete. Maxim (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC) reply
This nomination also includes:
We don't need to build shrines for vandals, we don't need to recognise their impact to the point where we label each and every their brand new sock with "look! it's really HIM!". We don't need to feed vandals' vanity by stating that every wannabe pagemove vandal may be them. We don't need to state that Grawp is banned - we simply don't need it to block his socks on sight. And finally, we don't need to turn him into Willy on Wheels The Second - what's next, {{ grawp}} expanding to {{sock|Grawp|blocked}} like it was before with {{ wow}} and numerous userboxen like "this user hates Willy"? Gosh, we can live with just one concise long-term abuse report. MaxSem( Han shot first!) 18:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC) reply
Comment This is neither a keep nor delete, but seriously, are you aware that he is being glorified at ED and that he is not one person, but rather a group of people who want to get attention. Face it, deleting this page will serve no useful purpose as he/she/they are being motivated by multiple sources (ED, 4chan, etc.) WP:DENY dosen't really apply to this case based on the fact that deleting this guy's userpage won't have a useful purpose. Just a heads up. PrestonH ( t ♦ c) 03:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC) reply
If you have given up on doing both things i can only salute you for your wise decision! John Stalvern ( talk) 19:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC) reply