World Trade Center

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Kept No examples have been given of poor prose, bloat or missing citations AIRcorn  (talk) 07:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC) reply

This article is bloated and in places badly written and in need of citations. It might survive a review if something is done quickly, but at the moment it definitely fails the criteria. Jamesx12345 ( talk) 20:35, 31 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Not seeing any issues with poor prose or citations. It is long, but that is probably warranted. Some examples of the problems would help. Could you also let the main contribtors and wikiprojects know. AIRcorn  (talk) 10:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Jamesx12345, I would like to point out the WP:GAR directive: "The aim is not to delist the article, but to fix it." It looks to me as if you have never contributed to the article talk page, and that you have made but one edit to the article itself, to remove the pop culture section. (This section was very small, referring mainly to the large-but-messy article World Trade Center in popular culture.) I am interested in discovering exactly what else you would remove to solve the perceived bloat, and what badly written prose you would fix. I wonder what stands out as lacking citations. I don't see a huge problem here. Binksternet ( talk) 12:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC) reply