January 29
File:Parks and recreation ron and tammy part two.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parks and recreation ron and tammy part two.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Illustrates two characters in a jail scene of the episode Ron & Tammy: Part Two. Either insufficiently supported by critical commentary, or easily conveyed in text (i.e. Plot section). Not contextually significant to the episode. George Ho ( talk) 02:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Parks and recreation hunting trip.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parks and recreation hunting trip.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Shows two characters doing private spit-take contest, which may be either easily conveyed in text or insufficiently supported by critical commentary. Furthermore, article or rather critics discuss just the chemistry between the two characters, not the spit-take, and both can be easily conveyed in text. The screenshot would be not contextually significant to the episode. George Ho ( talk) 02:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Parks and recreation woman of the year.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parks and recreation woman of the year.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Shows two characters holding an award while posing for a photo, which may be easily conveyed in text or insufficiently supported by critical commentary. From what I can read, the episode may have been about hypocrisy of the awards organization rewarding women more than about what's depicted in the screenshot. Don't see how omitting the screenshot can affect the understanding of the episode as a whole, development of, and reception to the episode. In other words, the photo pose screenshot may not be contextually significant to the episode. George Ho ( talk) 02:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Redheads.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Redheads.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pactio kiss ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Derivative work of packaging whose design looks too recent to be in public domain. Copyright issues aside, the quality of this photo is very low. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 ( talk) 03:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Parks and recreation 94 meetings.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parks and recreation 94 meetings.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Shows a female lead character being chained at a gate of the to-be-demolished gazebo, which may be easily conveyed in text or insufficiently supported by critical commentary. In other words, not contextually significant to the episode as a whole. George Ho ( talk) 03:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Parks and recreation christmas scandal.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parks and recreation christmas scandal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Shows a front cover story on a tabloid claiming relationship between a disgraced politician and a female lead character, which may be easily conveyed in text or insufficiently supported by critical commentary. In other words, not contextually significant to the episode Christmas Scandal. George Ho ( talk) 03:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Parks and recreation time capsule.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parks and recreation time capsule.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Shows
Will Forte's one-time character holding two Twilight novels. The scene may be easily conveyed in text, despite the episode's prevalent cultural references of Twilight franchise. Moreover, the episode is about citizens eventually debating what to submit in the town's time capsule more than about what's depicted in the screenshot, though Twilight novels are debated as well. There are scenes of the female political character sympathizing Forte's character. but I doubt they are hard to understand in text. Furthermore, I can use a free photo of Forte and copy the screenshot's whole caption for that image. I doubt
omitting the screenshot can affect the understanding of the whole episode, but I can stand corrected.
George Ho (
talk) 04:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC); edited, 05:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Parks and recreation flu season.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Parks and recreation flu season.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Depicts a female character (as a nurse) caring for a flu-ridden male politician, which may be easily conveyed in text. Furthermore, the episode is about the flu season affecting characters more than an exemplification of the plot, depicted in the screenshot. Also, a free image of actor Rob Lowe is already used. I doubt omitting the screenshot will affect the understanding of the episode, but I can stand corrected. George Ho ( talk) 04:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Catpeacetrain.ogg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Catpeacetrain.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sdpjswl ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Depicts the chorus of Peace Train. AFAICS, either it's insufficiently supported by critical commentary, or the lyrics can be easily conveyed or summarized in text. Not contextually significant to the song, despite being part of the song itself. Previously tagged for deletion in 2014, so I'm listing it here. George Ho ( talk) 06:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Downtown by Petula Clark.ogg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗ plicit 01:19, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Downtown by Petula Clark.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Peregrine Fisher ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Critical commentary insufficient to support the sample, or non-free content in the sample easily conveyed in text. Fails contextual significance. George Ho ( talk) 09:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep since there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion. Aspects ( talk) 00:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 12:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:MyFreeCams logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:MyFreeCams logo.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Störm ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Superseded by File:MyFreeCams - logo.svg Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 14:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Duramax-drydene-400-dover-logo-625x340.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Duramax-drydene-400-dover-logo-625x340.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zrcook610 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This appears to be taken from either https://media.zenfs.com/en/business-wire.com/940bc4d83ab2fe3bf8c52ec30390530a - see https://finance.yahoo.com/news/duramax-drydene-400-presented-reladyne-143000664.html - or https://www.doverspeedway.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/1011/2022/01/25/Main_1500x400-1400x400.jpg - see https://www.doverspeedway.com/2022/01/26/duramax-drydene-400/ Neither of these states that the logo is free use, it is almost certainly a copyright violation. Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 19:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:1937 three quarter length portrait of Eric Gill by Howard Coster.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:1937 three quarter length portrait of Eric Gill by Howard Coster.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 14GTR ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This does not meet the requirements of
(WP:NFCC#1
WP:NFCC#1. Although the non-free use rationale says "a search has found no free-use images of the subject", there's
this on Commons, which could adequately serve the same encyclopedic purpose.
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk) 22:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Is a self-portrait drawing considered equivalent to a photographic portrait for encyclopedic purposes ? I wouldn't have thought so as long as the other non-free use conditions are met but if that's what the rules say, so be it. If you are certain about deleting the photo', please proceed. Regards. 14GTR ( talk) 22:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The Sound of White samples
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗ plicit 01:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- File:Scar.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- File:Ten Days.ogg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs)
Both used by the time of the article's 2010 GA promotion. Right now, the songs are easy to convey in words, and/or the critical commentary is insufficient to support the samples. May not be contextually significant to the album as a whole, and deleting them isn't proven yet as detrimental to such understanding. George Ho ( talk) 22:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Right now, there's more information about the lyrical content on the songs' articles, but it's not enough to move the audio samples there, and they aren't even discussed at all on the album article (which is highly unconventional, I might add), so it looks like a universal failure of WP:NFCC#8 unless The Sound of White receives an extreme makeover sometime soon. ResPM ( T🔈 🎵C) 13:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.