October 22
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as
F7 by
Explicit (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 01:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Kevin Kamenetz.jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
links |
logs) – uploaded by
JGHowes (
notify |
contribs |
uploads |
upload log).
Replaceable with free images. Both
File:Kevin Kamenetz (27993611774).jpg and
File:County Executive Kevin Kamenetz (13466862545) (1).jpg are available under free licenses.
SecretName101 (
talk) 02:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: The uploader of this file passed away about a month ago. If there's a free equivalent now available for this file per
WP:FREER, then there's no longer a need for a non-free one and it should be deleted. In a case like this, though, a FFD discussion isn't really needed and the non-free can be tagged for speedy deletion per
WP:F7 unless there are significant doubts about the freeness of the new file. Those concerns, however, will need to be raised on Commons since issues with Commons files need to be resolved on Commons. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 09:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy delete --
evrik (
talk) 15:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- I have tagged the file for dated speedy deletion. I didn't want to spam a deceased uploader's talk page with deletion notifications, so I didn't notify the uploader. --
Stefan2 (
talk) 23:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete free alternative images exists, so fails
WP:NFCC#1.
Joseph
2302 (
talk) 09:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on
2021 December 8.
FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Frank Ocean Voodoo.ogg (
delete |
talk |
history |
links |
logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep in
Damaged Goods (song), remove from
Post-punk -
FASTILY 05:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Damaged Goods - Gang of Four.ogg (
delete |
talk |
history |
links |
logs) – uploaded by
ILIL (
notify |
contribs |
uploads |
upload log).
Currently used at
post-punk#United Kingdom. I'm unsure whether the usage complies with
WP:NFCC#8. The song is briefly mentioned outside the caption, which to me doesn't improve justification of using the sample. Furthermore, even when used at the song article, I don't know whether the critical commentary of
Damaged Goods (song) is sufficient enough to help the sample comply with the criterion. Also, the sample is nine seconds longer than what
MOS:SAMPLE allows based on the song's length. Nonetheless, fixing the sample's issues with
WP:NFCC#3b still wouldn't help the sample comply with the other criterion.
George Ho (
talk) 21:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy keep – The caption includes critical commentary about the sample's musical content and the fact that "Damaged Goods" is considered the first post-punk song. It would also be appropriate for inclusion on
Damaged Goods (song) because, uh, the entire article is about it? Sample should be trimmed, but not deleted.
ili (
talk) 00:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Which segment of the song please?
I want to upload a newer version that lasts 21 seconds or less.
George Ho (
talk) 02:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC); updated, 04:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- I trimmed out the last nine or ten seconds, just in case. I'm unsure whether the segment is right for critical commentary. The sample came from a part of the final third of the song, to which I recently listened on YouTube and Spotify.
George Ho (
talk) 04:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
- For the song article.
Aspects (
talk) 21:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep I'm not an expert on copyright rules but I can testify that this song has cultural significance.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
reply
- To which articles does the sample belong? --
George Ho (
talk) 02:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on
2021 December 8.
FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
reply
-
File:Faith No More – I Started a Joke (CD1).jpg (
delete |
talk |
history |
links |
logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.