The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 September 6. MBisanz talk 19:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted image. Appears to be a photoshopped copy of the image at https://www.amarujala.com/uttar-pradesh/ghazipur/nawab-kasim-fort-desecrated with a few pixels cropped from the bottom edge, and the colours brightened. John of Reading ( talk) 08:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot taken from TV show without permission. Copyrighted picture HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 09:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Poster for a non-notable YouTube series. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. ✗ plicit 13:33, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Uploader claims this to be own work, no proper source, questionable as to whether this is own work or not. I don't know if the PD-self tag makes this ineligible for WP:F4 which is why I'm taking this to FfD. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 20:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Unused, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Previously PRODded by User:Fastily and declined by User:Spinningspark as "files once used in articles should be kept to preserve integrity of article history". However, there is no evidence of this being used in any articles and to make things worse, this looks like a personal image based on the uploader's username. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 20:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, questionable as to whether this really is own work. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 20:11, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
I am seriously concerned with the licensing of this file, there is no proper source, I strongly suspect this is a copyright violation but I'm still taking this to FfD only because of the "ineligible for copyright" license used which I still think is wrong. Pkbwcgs ( talk) 21:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)