The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:JozenjidoriAvenue.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atsi Otani ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per c:COM:FOP#Japan. Japan only allows freedom of panorama for non-commercial uses, so this image is not free enough for Wikipedia's purposes. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 00:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Kamigoromo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atsi Otani ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per c:COM:FOP#Japan. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 00:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Wheel War MTG Card.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by GeeJo ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I was going to transfer this to Commons, but let's discuss first. Is the textured background and overall design of a MTG card copyrightable? If so, this is fair use, but not compliant with WP:NFCC, so should be deleted. If not, we can go ahead with the transfer to Commons. This image is quite amusing. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 02:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, on the side of caution the publishers of MTG might have a copyright on the card design. Plus the image is essentially orphaned and I don't see any value to keeping it. Same could apply to all the other card uploads on the same User page. Salavat ( talk) 12:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Dale08.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Querthouse ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Lots of non-free logos. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 02:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, essentially orphaned file with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Catacombs Skulls .JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Belong84 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned. Strikes me as a possibly useful image, but the EXIF data says it can't be used commercially. This contradicts the CC license. The uploader may be the photographer, but this whole situation is rather confused. Precautionary principle? ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 02:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned file with too many uncertainties on the licensing. Even the uploaders licensing sentence has this: "© Benjamin Long, 2006". Good photo though. Salavat ( talk) 11:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:BillyWrightStamp.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Silverfish4 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Royal Mail stamps are copyright to the Royal Mail and are not free. See c:Commons:Stamps/Public domain#United Kingdom. This appears to be flickrwashing. AntiCompositeNumber ( Ring me) 02:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned file with almost certainly incorrect licensing. Potentially could qualify for "db-f9". Salavat ( talk) 11:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Vacher1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Matthieu Poisson ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, PD tag with no supporting information. I greatly doubt its validity. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 04:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned file with no obvious value. The source provided does not support the licensing claim. Salavat ( talk) 11:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove all from Bids for the 2020 Summer Olympics. ℯ xplicit 01:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Istanbul 2020 Olympic bid logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AxG ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File:Madrid 2020 Olympic bid logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AxG ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Rome 2020 Olympic bid logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DH93 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Doha 2020 Olympic bid logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Felipe Menegaz ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Baku 2020 Olympic bid logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cekli829 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:Tokyo 2020 Olympic bid logo.svg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carniolus ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Decorative use of various non-free logos in Bids for the 2020 Summer Olympics. Each of these files is used as the primary means of identification in stand-alone articles about the bids themselves and those particular non-free uses seem fine. Their uses in the more general "Bids for the 2020 Summer Olympics", however, seems unecessary per WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFTABLES, item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI, WP:NFLISTS and MOS:LOGO.

Part of the "Bids for the 2020 Summer Olympics" is essentially an embedded list, combining/summarizing content from other stand-alone articles with other general information about the bidding process. This might be perfectly OK for textual content, but non-free use requires a much stronger justification. There are hatnotes provided linking to the relevant stand-alone articles about the bids where the reader can also see the individual non-free logos, which seems more than sufficient per NFCC#1 and item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI. There is no sourced critical commentary commentary of any of the individual logos in the more general article, so the context required by NFCC#8 is lacking.

There was one more additional file ( File:Tokyo 2020 Olympic bid logo.svg) also being used in the article, but it was removed because it did not have the seperate specific non-free use rationale required by WP:NFCC#10c. This file was actually being used twice in the same article: once in the main infobox and once later in the table of candidate cities. The non-free use in the main infobox seems questionable even if a rationale was provided, but the second use in the same article could not possibly be justified per WP:NFCC#3a even if the use in the main infobox would be allowed.

Suggest keep for all of these logos in the repsective stand-alone articles for each bid, but remove for each logo from the "Bids for the 2020 Summer Olympics" article. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 10:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Fully agreed, these should be removed from Bids for the 2020 Summer Olympics. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 11:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Sarajevo rose.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jonathanischoice ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Deleted on Commons, see c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sarajevo Roses. There is no FoP in Bosnia. AntiCompositeNumber ( Ring me) 15:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Bikestadium1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xpanderz ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Given the uploader's history of uploading copyvios, it's doubtful whether this image is actually his/her own work. Paul_012 ( talk) 18:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned file with no obvious value. Also not of a very high quality. Salavat ( talk) 11:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:YXE logo 2017.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Daylen ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems to fall below the threshold of originality in Canada - re-tag as {{ PD-textlogo}} and transfer to Commons. Jon Kolbert ( talk) 19:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Support license change per nom Daylen ( talk) 21:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Kah Bpowriver.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The Flickr link is dead and we don't have the photographer's name, but the license requires attribution. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 21:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 October 16#File:Riccarton Racecourse Branch map.png. ℯ xplicit 01:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Riccarton Racecourse Branch map.png ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Matthew25187 ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Only used in a userspace gallery, contrary to WP:NOTWEBHOST. Unlikely to be useful elsewhere. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 21:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• I'd say it's worth keeping. The Riccarton Racecourse has a rather interesting history, and horse racing was so popular in New Zealand at some point that it was worth building this branch railway. So once some history gets added to the article, the map would be a useful addition. Schwede 66 22:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use. ℯ xplicit 01:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Morag-Siller-Profile.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MichaelEHowe ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Questionable license. An archive does confirm the site said that the site was dual-licensed, but it's unclear whether that means every photograph on the site had those licenses. As a precautionary thing, it may be best to convert this to non-free use. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 21:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Delora the beautiful.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hamlet, Prince of Trollmark ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Useless image associated with an old "troll" sock account. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 21:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, essentially orphaned file with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:49, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SlimVirgin ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Jeremiah Duggan's route.JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SlimVirgin ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, unlikely to be useful. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 21:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Jeremiah Duggan (London-Paris-Wiesbaden).JPG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SlimVirgin ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, unlikely to be useful. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 21:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete, orphaned file with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SlimVirgin ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:Duggan's movements (3), 27 March 2003.jpg ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SlimVirgin ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, unlikely to be useful. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 21:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

I've deleted it. It was replaced some time ago. SarahSV ^(talk) 21:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

@ SlimVirgin: Thanks. You might get a couple more notifications from me, just so you're aware; I've been trying to sort through the very old files. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 22:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

File:TorrentFreak Screenshot.PNG ( delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Richiemcintosh ( notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Orphaned, unlikely to be useful. Has to go through FfD since it was previously kept at an FfD. ~ Rob₁₃ ^Talk 22:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete for the reasons I stated in Special:Diff/804416287. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete, orphaned file with no obvious value. Salavat ( talk) 11:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.