From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fugu

A tray of Fugu rubripes on ice

This curious looking fish is one of the many cultural rarities of Japan. Being the only delicacy forbidden to the Emperor of Japan, the fish's toxins are traditionally not entirely removed, so that the experience of consuming the fish is enhanced by a slight tingling of the tongue. This image captures the fish as presented in a public market. It highlights the prevalence of culture in Japan, and the slightly under prioritized physiological need of survival. Besides capturing this interesting delicacy, the image presents a myriad of local and universal human curiosities. Fugu Chris 73 (by User:Iamorlando )

  • Nominate and support. - iamorlando 00:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Seems to be flash-heavy. It distracts from the subject, IMHO. -- humble fool ® 00:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose Cool subject but they have the fish-version of red-eye - Ravedave ( help name my baby) 01:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose A cool topic but the fish seems a bit shiny and this makes the picture hard to interpret. Also the stuff around the fishes distracts from the topic a bit. -- Midnight Rider 03:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose As the photographer of the subject I like the picture, but I think it its not good enough to be featureworthy. For me it is sometimes difficult to make out the features clearly. Also, iamorlando, for my taste the nomination looks too much like it was signed by me, so I added your signature to the nom. -- Chris 73 | Talk 08:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose per above. Also, I have to say that for being so deadly, cooked fugu doesn't taste much different than other whitefish. The sashimi version was tasty, but not worth dying for. :) howch e ng { chat} 01:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose per above. - marbl e. wonder i ny 06:47, 3 December 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose per above. - Mailer Diablo 11:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply