Snowdrop Galanthus nivalis

Reason

Blown highlights on most of the flower, lowish res, nice pic

Previous nomination/s

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Galanthus nivalis close-up aka.jpg

Nominator

Noodle snacks ( talk)

Informed original nominator and/or uploader

Y Yes and yes. ~ ωαdεstεr16 _«talk ^stalk» 14:55, 10 April 2009 (UTC) reply

• Delist — Noodle snacks ( talk) 12:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply
• Delist per nom. Edges have bad exposure too. Zoo Fari 04:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC) reply
• Neutral "lowish res, nice pic"? The res conforms to standards. To quote from WP:WIAFP: "minimum of 1000 pixels in width or height". This one is 1000 pixels in width AND height. Besides, the camera is capable of more than that, so asking may be the way forward. "Nice pic" doesn't seem to actually argue for demoting. On the blown highlights side, how about we provide evidence of such claims as a matter of course from now on? Papa Lima Whiskey ( talk) 21:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC) reply

No consensus MER-C 02:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply