Sunset lorikeet
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 May 2020 at 03:56:07 (UTC)
- Reason
- Quality lead image, represents the subject well. If you are questioning the saturation, keep in mind this isn't unusual, these birds are very colorful [1], [2], [3]. Also this was shot using flash which pretty much removes the background.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Sunset lorikeet
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Creator
- Llez
![[1]](/info/en/?search=File:Trichoglossus_haematodus_-Jurong_Bird_Park,_Singapore_-Dec2009.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](/info/en/?search=File:Rainbow_lorikeet.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](/info/en/?search=File:Musk_Lorikeet_jul08.jpg){kind=link}
- Support as nominator – Bammesk ( talk) 03:56, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose From looking at other photos of this species online, I think that the use of flash has slightly missrepresented the colours. It has also made the photo somewhat unpleasant on the eye. As such, I don't think this meets the high standards set by other FP level photos of birds. Nick-D ( talk) 08:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I am wary of promoting zoo animals as their appearance may not mirror wild birds. Charlesjsharp ( talk) 09:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The plumage of this parrot is iridescent and so the the flash misrepresents the subject. JJ Harrison ( talk) 00:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Not Promoted -- Armbrust The Homunculus 08:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)