Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2012 at 23:36:11 (UTC)
Reason
This large, free image of actor Stanley Holloway is a clear, concise, sharp and well lit illustration which clearly identifies the subject and appears to be of a high quality.
Support as nominator --
Cassianto (
talk) 23:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose - Jpg artefacting and noise.
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 00:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose per Crisco, very heavy jpeg artifacts.
Jujutacular (
talk) 03:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)reply
As a non-photographer, I have absolutly no idea what "jpeg artifacts" means - I just thought it was a nice image. Oh well, I have not lost anything by trying. Thanks for the comments! --
Cassianto (
talk) 15:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Sorry for the lingo! The
compression artifact article should be helpful. It is indeed a nice image, but it is to heavily compressed. Thanks for nominating!
Jujutacular (
talk) 19:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC)reply