—Preceding
undated comment added 18:29, 23 August 2009 (UTC).
Support as nominator --
Cj.samson (
talk) 15:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. FWIW, I helped samson with some minor details in the nomination. --
Muhammad(talk) 15:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment. To be honest I'm not really feeling it - composition seems a bit cramped and I don't think I'm really learning much about the park. Visually and using the histogram it's quite a bit underexposed. Brighter versions have a bit more pop, but I'm still not overly convinced. However I won't oppose yet till you've had a chance to try an edit. Ideally if you had another version that at least showed to the end of the wires that may help with the cramped composition. --
jjron (
talk) 06:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose unless edit or better pic found Too dark, ends of bridge cut off, and could be any bridge over any gorge - no wow factor. IMHO would be better taken from below to give better idea of height of bridge from water, and view UP the falls which would have more of an appealing composition...
Gazhiley (
talk) 10:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose per above. Subject cut off. :)
MER-C 03:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)reply