Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 May 2013 at 10:11:06 (UTC)
Reason
I think it stacks up against all the quality criteria. This is the Australasian subspecies. It was put into the species article as a replacement for an
existing FP, so I'm also suggesting delisting for that one. The
second existing FP (in the taxobox) is of a different subspecies, and has a very different appearance.
Support as nominator --
99of9 (
talk) 10:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Support although the delist nom should be handled separately. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 05:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I understand it is hard to shoot animals when they are moving, but the head seems blur enough.
ArcticKangaroo (
✉ •
✎) 13:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Support as one who inserted this picture, replacing that existing FP. I think I did enough homework before that.
JKadavoorJee 14:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)...and Delist the other mentioned above per Chick Bowen.
JKadavoorJee 06:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Delist and replace. That is, I support this, and I'd ask someone to add my vote, with a link back here, to a delist nom when one is opened (which it should be).
Chick Bowen 00:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC) (Or alternately we could just consider this a delist and replace nomination per
the Obama one above.
Chick Bowen 01:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC))reply