Support as nominatorMbz1 (
talk) 15:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Good illustration of effect. Nice shot, but perhaps a bit to artistic for the technical subject. --
Mike Spenard (
talk) 16:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support per above, and you might want to add this image to
fog, too.
Dr. Extreme (
talk) 16:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Thank you for your suggestion, Dr. Extreme. I'm afraid
fog article is full of useful images and I see no place to add this one.--
Mbz1 (
talk) 03:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Well, there was an empty space in the fog gallery at the bottom, so I went ahead and added it.Dr. Extreme Well, never mind. That was hasty and ill-thought out.
Dr. Extreme (
talk) 14:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Good encyclopedic illustration with photographic merit.
DurovaCharge! 23:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support. Encyclopaedic and artsy. I still need to go home and think through the full implications of the physics behind that explanation though. (And nice to see you back on FPC Mila). --
jjron (
talk) 07:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support. Fantastic that you were able to capture this. howcheng {
chat} 00:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support per everyone else. I just love this picture.
Purple Is Pretty (
talk) 00:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support Excellent photograph of something that untill I looked at the photograph I knew nothing about, it has inspired me to read the
Parallax article, which is one of the key things recommended for a picture to become a featured picture. One of the best encyclopedic pictures nominated. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Trombodave (
talk •
contribs) 21:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Support. I was never strong in physics but this one is just great. -
Darwinek (
talk) 22:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)reply