Focus is bang on and photo is sharp, great resolution, super pose (also characteristically aggressive), and certainly the clearest image we have of facial and mouth detail for seals.
Definitely worth a proposal. upstateNYer 23:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)reply
I would support any such proposal. I am also happy to co-chair the subcommittee which decides the background colour of the page for the organisation of the vote count.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 09:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)reply
I think the proposal for said subcommittee needs to go to FPC:Talk first. --
jjron (
talk) 13:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Support As mentioned at COM:QI, there's a person in the left eye :) --ZooFari 22:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Heavy Support It's killer. So perfect. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Buggie111 (
talk •
contribs) 00:13, 11 January 2010
Support - Per nominator. -
☩Damërung☩. -- 04:49, 11 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Support wow, this is an awesome candidate. -
Fcb981(
talk:
contribs) 01:56, 13 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Must be really awesome to bring you back :-) --
Muhammad(talk) 05:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)reply
haha, it is certainly eye-catching, since I happened to be scrolling FPC. And it's nice to be recognized still, thanks Muhammad. -
Fcb981(
talk:
contribs) 05:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Question: In pictures of birds, I have seen that people ask for it to be a profile picture to be able to see the features of the beak, tail and wings. Why is it that in this case it is not asked? Not feature of wings, tail and shape of the body are really distinguishable. Is is different this in birds? franklin 22:03, 13 January 2010 (UTC)reply
It is particularly important for birds so that you can see the plumage. I guess this picture is supposed to be about "face and mouth detail", ie a portrait.
Noodle snacks (
talk) 22:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)reply
We have lots of bird FPs, so the expectations are higher. We rarely get arctic creature candidates. --ZooFari 22:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)reply
I've asked for that once or twice. My big difference is per Noodle Snacks, this guy another foot down is going to have basically the same coloration and such. Admittedly you get no tail detail here, but it provides significant information. Also, as Zoo mentions, more pics does tend to create higher standards.
Staxringoldtalkcontribs 16:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Support. Excellent picture of high encyclopedic value. -
Darwinek (
talk) 20:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Strong Support Not only is he cute, but instantly made me smile. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Neon Sky (
talk •
contribs) 20:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)reply