Kayleigh Pearson

Reason

After checking the criteria I believe that the image meets the standards set for a Featured Picture.

Articles this image appears in

Kayleigh Pearson

Creator

Jimbo online

• Support as nominator ---- Jimbo ^[online] 19:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose, busy background, poor lighting. -- Coneslayer ( talk) 19:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose. Agreed. Not bad for a user-shot photo in the article, but not really a FP-quality portrait. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 19:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per above comments. Clegs ( talk) 23:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose as per above. Noodle snacks ( talk) 06:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose "After checking the criteria I believe that the image meets the standards set for a Featured Picture." I don't. To busy, taken from too high an angle and flash is too strong. Capital photographer ( talk) 07:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Obvious fail here, but that is not to say that I didn't thoroughly enjoy this picture. smooth0⁷0₇ ( talk) 15:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose Mmm. Oh, uh ... yeah. It's really not FP quality, just a standard snapshot-esque photo. ¢rassic! ( talk) 16:01, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply
• Oppose per the points mentioned by Coneslayer, Diliff and Crassic. — αἰτίας • discussion• 20:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Not promoted . -- John254 18:44, 5 July 2008 (UTC) reply