Oppose – Negligible EV. Article is stub.
Sca (
talk) 15:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Support – the poor state of the article is neither here nor there: it can always be improved at a later date. –
SchroCat (
talk) 21:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)reply
FP category for this image? —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 23:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Also, oppose - the choice in background is a problem. If there weren't so many advertisements, I'd be fine with this, but the numerous logos are distracting. —
Crisco 1492 (
talk) 23:56, 9 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose Per Sca. This image shows what Ms Dujmovits looks like, which is always very useful, but doesn't have any connection with the reason for which she's notable (when I saw the photo I assumed she was a tennis player given the headband: it turns out that she's a snowboarder). The posture is also a bit awkward.
Nick-D (
talk) 11:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Conditional weak support (if I'm allowed to do that). This is a great photo, for my money, though the background is a little distracting. I would quite like to see an improved article, though.
Josh Milburn (
talk) 23:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose as above, not much indication that she is a snowboarder, distracting advertising in background, and minimal EV as article is a stub.
Mattximus (
talk) 22:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment. There is more indication of her profession (i.e. indication that she is a sportsperson of some kind) than is the case with many other successful nominations, which have no indication at all. I also personally find the background ads more scene-setting than distracting.
109.157.11.62 (
talk) 17:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)reply